• CherryBullets@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The fact that some replies don’t understand the title of the article and some are trying to explain it is funny af to me, I’m sorry 😂

  • scala@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    To make it worse year by year the republicans continue to defund education, remove sciences, sex education and history from being taught in schools. While trying to force christian religion in public schools.

    What a timeline America is going through.

  • m3t00🌎@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    knew an old man who couldn’t read. he could write phone numbers in a notebook and remembered who it was by where it was written. no names. Fort Worth 1980.

  • Bgugi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    For clarity: this is based on piaac test results. The literacy test results are sorted into 6 categories (1-5 and <1) for comparing the distribution internationally. 54% of Americans score less than 3, compared to top-scoring Japan and top-english-speaking Australia at approximately 35% and 45%. The task description for level 3:

    Adults at Level 3 are able to construct meaning across larger chunks of text or perform multi-step operations in order to identify and formulate responses. They can identify, interpret or evaluate one or more pieces of information, often employing varying levels of inferencing. They can combine various processes (accessing, understanding and evaluating) if required by the task . Adults at this level can compare and evaluate multiple pieces of information from the text(s) based on their relevance or credibility. Texts at this level are often dense or lengthy, including continuous, noncontinuous, mixed. Information may be distributed across multiple pages, sometimes arising from multiple sources that provide discrepant information. Understanding rhetorical structures and text signals becomes more central to successfully completing tasks, especially when dealing with complex digital texts that require navigation. The texts may include specific, possibly unfamiliar vocabulary and argumentative structures. Competing information is often present and sometimes salient, though no more than the target information. Tasks require the respondent to identify, interpret, or evaluate one or more pieces of information, and often require varying levels of inferencing. Tasks at Level 3 also often demand that the respondent disregard irrelevant or inappropriate text content to answer accurately. The most complex tasks at this level include lengthy or complex questions requiring the identification of multiple criteria, without clear guidance regarding what has to be done

    I could not find which source originally cited level 2 as “6th grade” equivalent, though the oecd recommends against drawing that parallel.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      This reads like a description of the D&D PHB.

      …is that why so many people think they get an extra attack when they do something other than an Attack action? Yes, that includes the Ready action. You get one hit if you ready an attack.

    • joel_feila@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Hmmm so back in 6th grade when i would read the questions on the test and fond the answer to ome question in a different question on a different page was that level 3 reading?

  • railcar@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is pretty much all you need to know about the state of the United States. It’s being run by 10 year old imbeciles.

    • MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      no, its being run by greedy, assholes, who know exactly what they’re doing. The 10 year old imbeciles are their republican voters and the yes-men they hire to do their bidding.

  • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    If all natural-born citizens has to go through the naturalization process before getting the right to vote, trump would never have been elected.

    Not just because they don’t know the 100 (I think they changed it to 120 now?) questions, but also because they would not pass the:

    “Have you ever been a member of any totalitarian party?
    Have you ever been a member of a terrorist organization?
    Have you ever advocated the overthrow of any government by force or violence?
    Have you ever persecuted any person because of race, religion, national origin, or political opinion?” Questions

    (Fun fact: They can revoke your citizenship after the fact if they catch you lying, or if you do any “terrorist” activity within 5 years of naturalization. Jan 6 riotor types would never pass this. As a naturalized citizen, I’m kinda dreading this since last November)

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          School starts at home (for many parents, this is an unbelievable idea). I had a classmate who is an anti-vaxxer, even though we did biology together and learned how vaccines worked. My classmate is alright as a person, but I think her environment outside of school made her not one of the sharpest tool in the class and never paid attention to the lessons. My point is that, if the home environment is not conducive to learning, the person is less likely to be intellectually driven. I know there are exceptions and it boils down to “nature versus nurture”, but as mentioned already, an environment that does not foster learning makes the person less likely to pursue knowledge.

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Why do you think Reaganomics was implemented? If both parents work, they aren’t going to be able to spend as much time teaching their kids to read.

            • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Some parents are genuinely lazy. More often than not, a typical phrase some parents would use is “didn’t they teach you that in school?”

          • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            This is also a big thing. If I may add to it, the environment may also help add maturity needed for certain topics. My HS had a banking and personal finance class. Many kids just didn’t care, others didn’t have any way to visualize it as they didn’t really get an allowance, and those with jobs who would benefit the most were often not taking the class because they needed to work.

            I was lucky to be there. Really that I was able to credit by exam some classes; which gave me space in my junior and senior year to fill.

  • conicalscientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    The podcast called Sold a Story talks about how the school systems adopted a curriculum that doesn’t teach kids how to read. They are more like mimicking literacy. It gives appearances they they are reading but they aren’t comprehending.

    • MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      get out into the low income areas. if you spend a lot of time there, you’d probably be surprised to know the reading level is as high as it is.