- cross-posted to:
- programming@programming.dev
- cross-posted to:
- programming@programming.dev
You must log in or register to comment.
So much work just to avoid using Redis. If I wanted to use SQL for cache, I’d rather choose the
memory
engine of MySQL.If I wanted to use SQL for cache, I’d rather choose the memory engine of MySQL.
Why would you onboard an entirely separate service if you’re already using PostgreSQL ?
Honestly it feels like a hack with multiple drawbacks. I’d personally rather use something specifically designed for the job.