• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    shield
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    4 months ago

    Lemmy isn’t a court of law, neither is the Internet. It’s pretty much universally accepted he killed the guy, if it wasn’t, we wouldn’t have the hero worship.

    What the court is going to decide is if he’s justified or not.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      Lemmy isn’t a court of law, neither is the Internet.

      Proceeds to cite general Internet opinion as proof of guilt.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        Again, this isn’t about “guilt”. Guilt implies some level of wrongdoing, and the court is still out on that.

        The question they will determine is “was he justified”, not “did he do it.”

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      The court is also going to need to decide if the cops planted the evidence he conveniently carried with him several days later.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        4 months ago

        Any conspiracy theory is going to do some heavy lifting explaining how the highly custom pistol in the video is not the same highly custom pistol found on Luigi.