The virtual school says its hands are tied due to Florida’s “don’t say gay” law. However, the teacher has lodged a complaint against it.

        • The How™
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We literally made up Ms., Mrs., and Mr.

          That’s how language works, we get to make it up as we go along.

          How do you think we got here??

            • The How™
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh I get it, you’re just in denial about modern gender theory. Good luck with your rocks. The trick is to bang them together.

      • OBG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        As opposed to commonly accepted titles. Not made up, flavor of the day nonsense. Your generation can put up with this shit after mine is gone. Good luck, you are most definitely going to need it.

        • waz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hypothetical question:

          I have a friend named Richard. He prefers to be called Rich but his boss calls him Rick.

          Should his boss adjust to call him Rich because that is what he prefers, or should he just accept being called Rick because it is a commonly accepted nickname for Richard?

          • cricket99@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s a name, not a title. You don’t get to choose titles, they reflect objective truths.

            • oatscoop@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Exactly, those titles have meaning that reflect “objective truths”. E.g. I don’t conform to society’s male or female gender roles or expectations.

              It’s almost as if language exists to convey information and has been evolving with the constantly changing society that uses it.

              … or was your comment an appeal to made-up semantics because you don’t actually have a compelling argument?

          • OBG@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            Follow well established societal mores, do not change them for .001%.

            • Claidheamh@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Answer the question. Why reply just to dodge it? Could have simply not engaged. It’s so weird to me.

              • OBG@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I did give a valid and correct answer to the question. You either didn’t understand or know I’m right so dropped back to the default… ItS sO WeIrD tO mE

    • Tenbot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      All titles are “made up,” and Mx. as an honorific has been around for almost fifty years. A better question would be why our two main honorifics for people are so pointlessly gendered.

        • Tenbot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your claim as to its history is simply not true, and its use has, obviously, been mostly limited to the community that generated it. Did you expect Ronald Reagan to use it in his inauguration speech?

          Other than that, I don’t see what point you’re actually trying to make here.

        • Tenbot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You just read an article about a non-binary person, so I think we can assume they are, indeed, “a thing.” Something tells me you don’t interact with a lot of queer people anyways, so your acceptance of their terms of address feels pretty irrelevant.

      • 100_percent_a_bot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s words that develop organically and then there’s words that people make up to validate the feelings of women who would have been emos like 10 years ago. Neopronouns and titles like this are stupid and no person outside the progressive bubble will ever use them.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here’s an idea- let’s not care if it’s fucking stupid and call people what they want to be called?