Even down here where Fabulosa is common, I occasionally mistake it for juice. I guess people are mortally terrified of “communist conformity” and need the soothing market comforts of 80 flavors of everything all from the same one company, but I would truly love if most products were regulated to come in standardized containers.
Imagine the benefits. You can still have whatever insane labels you want. But now all bottles are instantly identifiable by shape or silhouette. Tall, squarish, and easily pourable, must be juice. Short, round, with embedded poison symbols? Not juice!
All bottles of a type could be easily sorted, cleaned, and reused. No worries about plastic cross contamination.
Each kind of bottle is engineered by a materials science task force to be the right kind and amount of plastic to make this work long term for each purpose.
Because gov. subsidies will help manufacture the standardized bottle and everyone can use them, costs actually go down across industries. The recycling sector could also stand to grow by increased need for logistics and management of standardized waste, which becomes another cheap stream of materials for packagers.
Kids, foreign visitors, the aged or infirm, the inebriated, and others all benefit from faster, easier identification of the kind of material they are dealing with. Again, “Is this food?” is one of life’s fundamental questions and what is “society” doing for anyone if it’s not at least making that question easier and more reliable to answer?
if containers were standardized it would irreperably harm the gag product industry. like ketchup bottles that look like soap bottles, pine sol floor cleaner, hotsauce in yellow mustard shaped containers, soda in champagne bottles, tin can of lead, gallon bottles of soy sauce.
Even down here where Fabulosa is common, I occasionally mistake it for juice. I guess people are mortally terrified of “communist conformity” and need the soothing market comforts of 80 flavors of everything all from the same one company, but I would truly love if most products were regulated to come in standardized containers.
Imagine the benefits. You can still have whatever insane labels you want. But now all bottles are instantly identifiable by shape or silhouette. Tall, squarish, and easily pourable, must be juice. Short, round, with embedded poison symbols? Not juice!
All bottles of a type could be easily sorted, cleaned, and reused. No worries about plastic cross contamination.
Each kind of bottle is engineered by a materials science task force to be the right kind and amount of plastic to make this work long term for each purpose.
Because gov. subsidies will help manufacture the standardized bottle and everyone can use them, costs actually go down across industries. The recycling sector could also stand to grow by increased need for logistics and management of standardized waste, which becomes another cheap stream of materials for packagers.
Kids, foreign visitors, the aged or infirm, the inebriated, and others all benefit from faster, easier identification of the kind of material they are dealing with. Again, “Is this food?” is one of life’s fundamental questions and what is “society” doing for anyone if it’s not at least making that question easier and more reliable to answer?
Why not have stuff just clearly labeled? “floor cleaner” on this one.
if containers were standardized it would irreperably harm the gag product industry. like ketchup bottles that look like soap bottles, pine sol floor cleaner, hotsauce in yellow mustard shaped containers, soda in champagne bottles, tin can of lead, gallon bottles of soy sauce.