• phantomwise@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Wait am I the only one who actually likes WEBP and is cheering for JPEG to finally die ? 😭

    • Overshoot2648@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Webp can die. JpegXL is better in every metric and can losslessly compress existing jpeg images. The chromium team has been notably trying to kill JXL because they spent so much time on AVIF and Webp despite neither offer anything close to JXL.

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If webp didn’t come from google I might cheer it. I refuse to adopt any standard made by google if I can help it. If google made it, they made it with some reason or ability to alter it that’s nefarious and anti consumer. They wouldn’t make an improved open standard that wasn’t going to allow them to do shady shit.

      • valtia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        They made it because better image compression means less storage is required for images. Even if it’s a small upgrade, over trillions of images or exabytes of data saved translates into millions of dollars saved. This is the same thing for the delta format as another example

        By making .webp an open standard, more people will use it, thus more space savings will be had by default

          • valtia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I’m sure Google literally doesn’t care, as long as a more effective compression algorithm is used. That’s why they made it an open standard, use whatever you want but don’t demonize .webp unnecessarily