• carrion0409@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Once again Bernie is spitting facts. At this point the DNC is just a make a wish party for the elderly. They dont actually care about anything as long as it doesn’t prevent them from getting more money. I sincerely hope the party fails and we get something better in it’s place but knowing our luck these ass clowns will continue to fail upward.

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Because Sanders isn’t a Real Progressive^TM and actually smart enough to acknowledges one can both be critical of the current Democratic party and leadership while accepting the reality in actual daily life in America and its citizens.

      However, Sanders did strongly disagree with one of his host’s points when Schulz expressed disappointment that, despite being sidelined by the establishment, Sanders continued to back Democratic nominees like Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Kamala Harris in 2024.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sanders got cheated and still worked for the winners. Sanders did more speeches for Clinton than he did for himself on the campaign tour. Sanders knew that the DNC was the only major party that had a major chance defeat Trump.

        • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yeah, the Democratic leadership is completely corrupt and inept at this point and they did every every progressive presidential candidate dirty these past decade. And yeah it’s really sad and sickening that even now they’re thrashing like crazy and doing everything they can to resist progressive influence, trying to keep their wealthy donors happy, look at what their trying to do with Hogg.

          But yeah, I do really agree with Sanders that Democrats, with all of their major character and leadership flaws, realistically is the only way to beat Trump and the Republicans.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    He isn’t wrong. If they hadn’t pushed a senile 81 year old incumbent leader upon us as their candidate, in a blatant attempt to parachute an unpopular vice president into power once the 25th Amendment had to inevitably be invoked, then we would never have had a second Trump term.

    Biden should never have ran for a second term, and allowed time for the Democrats to field a decent candidate for the White House. The fact that Harris literally lost to somebody who tried to stir up an insurrection against Congress four years ago says it all.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Harris didn’t lose. Trump didn’t win. They stole the election through every single means available. There is clear data that shows they tried it in 2020, and failed. They perfected it in 2024. “If I win you’ll never need to vote again.” “Elon knows sic. [everything] about the machines, he’ll make sure we win.”

      Voting won’t save us now. Self defense and community defense are all we have left. The system has been stolen by the ultra rich, and they are gleefully enacting as much violence against us all as they want, because they “know” they don’t have to listen to us anymore.

      https://sdvoice.info/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won-here-are-the-numbers/

      https://youtu.be/UgIay64Obcs

      https://youtu.be/t-yr-Mgkhm0

      https://electiontruthalliance.org/eta

      First and last links are the data. The middle links are for us stupid people that need to be told how to read the data in the last link.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        No one is asking for Bernie as president anymore-- he’s clearly too old. But we like his speeches and party leadership.

      • Clbull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Bernie is a whole lot more compos mentis than Biden ever was.

        The right time to elect him would’ve been 2016…

      • QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        I agree with him, but that doesn’t mean I think he should be president. While I really like the idea of him as president in theory, I do feel that he is too old and that there are too many risks associated with that. We should have age limits regardless of who’s running. But I think he’d make a great advisor to a president regardless—that way if he takes a turn for the worse it doesn’t put the country in any sort of jeopardy.

      • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        He is the singular exception to all of our complaints about age, although we do still complain about his age. He gets a pass because he’s been doing the work for decades.

        • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Translation: ‘Yes, but this doesn’t count because fuck you.’

          Use aoc as an example, pass the torch, stop counting on ancient fossils to save you, that’s the republican platform.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s arguing in bad faith

        They don’t have a legitimate reason for their candidate over a different one so they just repeat fox news talking points

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nothing like clickbait headlines using a right-wing podcaster to put words in Bernie’s mouth.

    Oh, Return2Ozma? Who would’ve guessed.

  • Omega@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 days ago

    Bernie has the greatest leverage in a potential third party, though with the system we have I think it’ll just lead to the left losing again because of a voter split.

    Assuming the elections will be fair with trump around, he effectively bypassed court already, he can adjust procedures to solidify his successor

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      he or AOC could announce their third party run now and demand the democratic left get behind them in advance

    • srasmus@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve long wondered why the populist democrats haven’t been pushing harder for ranked choice voting options, or proportional representation, or any other voting system than what we have. I’m no election expert, so I’m sure there’s a reason, but it’s disheartening to be trapped between two parties.

      • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 days ago

        The Democrats in charge benefit from the status quo. It’s that simple. They would prefer to let Republicans win elections if the only other option is letting a pro worker candidate win.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          i say they benefit from Rs winning, because they get to grift as much as the gop, without getting the blame of the disastrous policies the gop enacts every election cycle. and when it comes time for Ds to get elected, they benefit/grift even more. THE CULTURE WAR BS is just to distract republicans and to an extent some dem voters from them noticing orchestrating this behind the scenes as a uniparty, by extension also to protect thier billionaire donors. sanders, aoc, MAYBE walz? are totally outsiders and are not privelieged to the grift of the dnc and gop.

          Even whitmer recently have been seen shilling for trump, lowkey wise.(she entertained him twice to work with him)

          it also kinda make sense why a lot of dems are also DINOS too.

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Because they’ll lose power too. I live in blue Oregon and it was on the ballot in November, but both parties came out against it with nonsense about how popular candidates will lose, your votes will be stolen, etc, etc and it was resoundly defeated. All their rhetoric about helping the working class are blatant lies they tell you to get elected which is why we’ve been on a steady downward trend as a country for decades regardless of which of these “two” sides hold office.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The outcome would be no worse than the last election, so why not go for it anyway?

      Bernie is the best positioned to get serious traction in a 3rd party in relatively short order. It’s one of my greatest wishes that he utilize the influence he has now to do just that, because the Dems are absolutely a lost cause and they will never provide a way out of fascism.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        unfortunately hes like 80+years old right now, so are people willing to vote for someone that old.

    • Archangel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t think a 3rd party is necessary when anyone can run as an independent. Bernie has always shown the path forward. More folks just need to follow his example.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        just

        I love how you compressed an entire movement and the splitting of the progressive vote and another 4 years of GqPs as one word. What’s very efficient.

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          If you’re worried about splitting the vote, then maybe the liberals in the Democratic party should fall in line behind Bernie. I love this presumption that it should always be the progressives who fall in line and vote for the “lesser evil” right wing candidates every single time. Look where that has gotten us.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Yeah a little too late Bernie. You’ll tell us to vote for Gavin Newsom/Liz Cheney 2028 as well. The modern Dem party is an enrichment cult.

    • mcv@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      And he’d be right to, if the alternative is MAGA.

      But this is the buf problem un US politics. Of course you should vote against Trump, and of course even the most questionable Democrat is preferable to Trump. But with only two options, that seems to have lead the Democrats to think they don’t even have to try anymore. They keep drifting further to the right, instead of running a credible opposition.

      The US desperately needs more options, but the system is rigged to allow only two credible parties. To change, there are only two options: seize control of the Democratic Party, primary every lackluster candidate, until the DNC can’t ignore that people demand better. Or start a new grassroots party, but it would have to be universally seen as the only way to get change, it needs to be massively funded to take on the machines of the other two parties, and convince the American voter that they really can win in this system that’s rigged against the people.

      Primarying is certainly the more likely option, but you need to do it everywhere.

  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I didn’t read the article or listen to podcast. Just came to say 2 party system doesn’t work. Thank you. Cheers.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    The episode opened with Schulz introducing Sanders as having been “mocked, sidelined, and betrayed—and that’s just by his own party,”

    Well that’s the thing, the Democrats aren’t “his own party”. Sanders is totally OK with being an Independent right up until it comes time to run for President.

    The DNC saw/see him as an outsider, not a Democrat, which is also a fair statement.

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      That doesn’t make his statement incorrect. They view him as an outsider because both the Democrats and Republicans are right wing parties and he isn’t right wing.

      • Zealousideal_Fox_900@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Calling all dems right wing is a stretch. There are more left candidates and members, see AOC. But yeah, the dems are mostly a centrist/right party now.

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’d argue that it doesn’t really matter if some elected members hold leftist views because they’re ignored and pushed to the side by the rest of the party at every turn.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Criticizing the DNC for their repeated, deliberate failings, or the consequences thereof, is not “both-siding”. The lesser evil doesn’t get a pass for being lesser, especially when it could be doing much, much more to combat the obvious greater evil, but chooses not to.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        This isn’t a problem with the dems.

        This is a problem with voters who fucked this up and then pathetically blame things that aren’t themselves. Dems can’t bail you out if you don’t vote them to fix it. So blaming them now is futile.

        Grow the fuck in and Own your fuck up.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      More of a “Republicans are running a fucking circus” and “Most Democrats seem to sit idly by as the clowns are running the circus”.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Dems are outnumbered in congress. You cant expect them to pass anything.

        Vote better. This entire fuck up is on voters. not on ‘dems’. Own your responsibility in this.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I expect them to filibuster everything. They have filibustered nothing. In Cory Booker’s case, he literally filibustered nothing. His “filibuster” blocked no specific legislation or appointee.