• HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    A lot of people talk about taxing folks like this and then using the money to supply the housing.

    The thing is, given the money, few people could pull this off well. The site isn’t just being plopped down; from the sound of the article in the comments it’s being actively developed as a community with other safeguards and support, by someone who sunk a lot of time into finding out what would work to help people rather than just appear to help.

    A scheme like this is hard to replicate because, in addition to money, it needs a core team with a clear vision and the time to really make it a focus of their lives. It also needs a community that will embrace it - for example it would likely work in the town I grew up in, but the town I work in (and am sadly forced to live in) now would likely drive such a project to failure.

    It’s a good idea that worked against the odds, and should be celebrated for that alone.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      A scheme like this is hard to replicate because, in addition to money, it needs a core team with a clear vision and the time to really make it a focus of their lives.

      Sounds like an opportunity for the local government, and a way to create local jobs.

      • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Local government’s have had such opportunities for decades, the evidence suggests that this doesn’t work overly well.