Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoDouble standardsslrpnk.netimagemessage-square129linkfedilinkarrow-up1994arrow-down116
arrow-up1978arrow-down1imageDouble standardsslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square129linkfedilink
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoThey literally did. Why are you disregarding her account and acting like this is some kind of hypothetical?
minus-squarenull_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·2 days agoThat’s not what her account said at all. You’re making up a narrative that doesn’t exist.
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 hours agoNo, that’s literally what she said. Get some reading comprehension ffs. HR talked to her instead of the boss who made the rude comment. Read it as many times as you need…
minus-squarenull_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 hours agoSorry mate all the comments in this thread are asserting different things. The screen cap says HR spoke to her. You’re saying that means that they’ve taken the supervisors side. That would expose the company to a legal claim, which is the antithesis of what every other comment here says HR is supposed to do.
They literally did. Why are you disregarding her account and acting like this is some kind of hypothetical?
That’s not what her account said at all. You’re making up a narrative that doesn’t exist.
No, that’s literally what she said. Get some reading comprehension ffs. HR talked to her instead of the boss who made the rude comment. Read it as many times as you need…
Sorry mate all the comments in this thread are asserting different things.
The screen cap says HR spoke to her.
You’re saying that means that they’ve taken the supervisors side.
That would expose the company to a legal claim, which is the antithesis of what every other comment here says HR is supposed to do.