Resurfaced comments in which new House Speaker Mike Johnson talked about how he and his son monitor each other’s online activity using “accountability software” have raised questions about national security.

Johnson, a Republican who was first elected to Congress in 2016, spoke in 2022 about how he installed software called Covenant Eyes on his devices during a panel called “War on Technology” at Cypress Baptist Church in Benton, Louisiana, Rolling Stone reported.

According to a clip first posted on X, formerly Twitter, by a user called Receipt Maven, Johnson spoke about how the subscription-based service helps people abstain from internet porn and “objectionable” websites.

  • @OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    2831 year ago

    I thought this was overblown at first glance but reading into it…

    From Wikipedia:

    Accountability software typically functions by continuously making screenshots of the user’s mobile phone or computer screen and monitoring their internet traffic. It checks both for keywords (such as “gay” or “porn”) and images associated with the behavior the software is intended to detect.

    So like even if the Speaker is on a VPN securely viewing classified material, if it’s on his phone or laptop, Covenant Eyes now has screenshots of it. That is very much a breech of national security if that is happening.

    • @Jimbabwe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1631 year ago

      Holy balls, it costs almost as much as Netflix ($204/year) and all it does is spy on you?! I’m not an evil man but these idiots ask for this service. I wish I’d thought of it.

      • ZeroCool
        link
        fedilink
        English
        77
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        it costs almost as much as Netflix ($204/year)

        LMAO what?! My god, it could not be more obvious that every single anti-porn crusader out there has serious issues with self-control and project it onto the rest of society. And let’s not even get into the fact that they have a ridiculously unhealthy understanding of human sexuality.

          • @TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            This, they have been indoctrinated into “original sin” where everything is bad (especially most all sexuality outside of a male and female in a government-issued wedlock) and must be controlled, even if purely natural given by their “God”.

        • Overzeetop
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Sorry, $204/yr is not enough for me to keep tabs on someone else’s festishes. Especially not those of a Republican congressman.

          • @littlewonder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Sure, but MDM software is easy enough to make into a product that does this service on autopilot. And it sounds like the people moderating the content are the users themselves. Genius!

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      641 year ago

      I’m sure there’s no chance that a “Christian-based surveillance company” is mishandling the data they collect in unsecure or nefarious ways.

      • ZeroCool
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Fun fact: Before starting his weird anti-porn spyware company the CEO of Covenant Eyes, Ronald DeHaas, worked as a geologist for Chevron in the 70s. In fact, he’s still helping to destroy the planet by working as a consultant for the petroleum industry. He never actually stopped. So he’s always been an unscrupulous P.O.S.

    • BabyWah
      link
      fedilink
      431 year ago

      Why always get the gays involved? I swear, these people are obsessed with penises and projecting at this point.

      I mean I’m a straight woman, I watched one video just because I was curious about the practicality of things and was too embarrassed to harass a gay friend about it.

      But when I want to get horny now, it doesn’t even cross my mind. Even though there was one scene with Nick Offerman that was really hot in The Last of Us.

      So major projection from these people.

      • squiblet
        link
        fedilink
        43
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Some Christian men talk about “SSA” (same sex attraction) and their struggle to “resist the temptation”. As a non-repressed straight man, this is not something I’ve ever dealt with. I feel bad that these people are so indoctrinated and intimidated by their weird-ass culture that they can’t just relax and go grab a dick.

        • Poggervania
          link
          fedilink
          221 year ago

          It’s because Christianity (and by nature, offshoots of it) was, and still is, a means of control.

          Let’s not forget the roots of Christianity was from when it was a literal cult; you were considered a part of the Christian Cult if you practiced Christianity before iirc either Theodosius or Constantine became the Roman Emperor and made it into the state religion. Christmas was also stolen from Sol Invictus as a means to help bridge the transition into Christianity.

          • @LemmysMum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            121 year ago

            Not to mention the fact that America was founded by puritans who were kicked out of Britain for not being allowed to oppress everyone around them.

          • @Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            Constantine. Allegedly had a vision/dream where he was told to put either a chi-rho or tau-rho symbol on his shields ahead of the Battle of the Milvian Bridge, and after victory he converted, with the rest of the Roman Empire following his lead.

        • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          The thing is, being a closeted homosexual isn’t even a binary thing. Everyone’s sexuality is a little bit fluid. I seriously believe that most of these people are bothered by the fact that they don’t find the male form completely repulsive, or by the idea that they may even have romance-adjacent feelings about another man without necessarily wanting to bottom for them.

          These people aren’t closeted, they are just repressed. It’s like living among a group of people who insist that the color orange doesn’t exist and shame anyone who says they can see it. Obviously everyone sees orange, and choosing to live with the cognitive dissonance of orangephobics is incredibly stressful.

      • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Fear of bigger dicks, I think. The opposite is their obsession with BBCs with white women. Not a psychologist, arm-chair opinion.

    • rigatti
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      If it’s high enough classification, he would not have access on his personal phone though.

      • @Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        20
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The risk does not stop at the line of classification. Comms for example, anyone he texts or is texted to those screens are taken and stored off.

        It is a risk to national security, period. It’s a fuckin social engineering jackpot for fucks sake.

      • @NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If he is following proper protocols and procedures: Yes

        If he were following proper protocol, he wouldn’t willingly install spyware in the first place.

        And unless he is VERY strictly separating his work and his personal devices, there is inevitable leakage. Even something as simple as getting too close to the line on “So I need to fly out to Nevada to check out these weather balloon things and make sure everything is fine” and so forth.

        But also? All of this is publicly available information. At a high level, there are two kinds of classified material. Stuff that is classified by specific rules and are generally based on science and technology. And the other is “national security” and is more or less anything a bureaucrat thinks is important.

        So the POTUS liking two shots of soy milk in his coffee is not classified because soy milk and coffee are not classified. But if it is decided that “terrorists” might attack the soy milk supply chain? Suddenly there is an argument that that information is sensitive.

        And there are a LOT of arguments to be made regarding the Speaker of the House’s personal ties and vulnerabilities becoming “sensitive”.

        And then you have people like trump who just give zero shits and are likely to take a picture of a document so they can show it to other people later.

      • @metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Right, even if he had access to classified information in an unsecured space, the classified system would have its own encryption device and its own systems separate from the unclassified network.

      • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        That’s only part of it though. Another component is that anyone having access to his personal devices --let alone his porn habits-- potentially has compromising information on him. Once he’s compromised, he’s a national security threat, full stop.

        What if he’s having an affair and there’s evidence of it on his phone? What if he’s doing other shady shit that involves not having a bank account? You better believe the Russians and/or the CCP would love to have compromat on the Speaker.

        • rigatti
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Sure, but there’s probably already plenty of ways to compromise these idiots.

  • @Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1411 year ago

    Imagine needing spying accountability software to not watch gay porn. These weird homophobes really are the gayest of them all.

  • @dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    531 year ago

    I grew up in the far right evangelical Christian church and watching people’s horror when they hear little tidbits about how fucked up it is always entertaining to me. I know a bunch of people who use the same software on their computers.

  • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    49
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wait, this dude is such a deviant he needs to install software on his own devices to keep him away from porn?

    Let me guess, his wife once found gay porn on his computer, and he said he didn’t know anything about it and did the typical conservative “doth protest too much” thing and decided that paying for a porn filter would give him cover to keep looking at porn?

    Do these people really think they are fooling anyone?

  • @jasondj@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    48
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    All the fucking cybersecurity bullshit I gotta go to as a network admin for a federal contractor and the baddies can just have some tech illiterate federal representative install whatever back doors they want on their personal computers under the guise of morality or whatever.

    • Cyanogenmon
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      Hello fellow admin.

      Feel the same way. The most secure network is only as secure as its dumbest user.

      Sadly we’re still a couple hundred years off of that being less of a concern :/.

  • @Yewb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    481 year ago

    Does he so desperately want to look at porn that he needs this? How about will power?

    Who the fuck are these people.

  • @_number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    45
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    this shit is so fucking creepy and insane. if literal receipts about the porn i look at came up in a family conversation for any reason whatsoever my brain would melt and explode. how are these freaks so outwardly successful but behind closed doors they’re spying on their son’s porn viewing??

    how does this motherfucker do speaking tours with these blood curdling weird christians and become like the 4th most powerful person in government? why do we keep respecting people who can’t even jerk off like an adult? we used to be a proper country! we used to do rebellions!

    he doesn’t even have any particular juice or charisma! he’s just white and clean shaven and wears a button down so give him the fucking keys to congress, jesus fucking christ

  • @nymwit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    391 year ago

    This dude is super creepy and I hate he’s in congress, much less the speaker, but does anyone feel like the other headline “monitors each others porn activities” purposely makes it seem like they’re each reviewing the porn they each do look at and making sure isn’t toooo skeevy? Like it’s weird enough, do you have to push it?

    Made me picture them high fiving each other the next day, “yeah buddy! I saw that one, too. Nice.”

    • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      I think the headline’s intent is more “what did he get caught doing which prompted the need for him to buy a porn blocker for his own machine?”

      Like, nobody in the world does that unless someone caught them looking at porn.

      • @CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        191 year ago

        “Does he have weird third-party monitoring software on his government phone?” is what the headline is referencing, that’s a massive problem. Confidential info could end up who-knows-where if it was sniffed.

    • @Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      makes it seem like they’re each reviewing the porn they each do look at and making sure isn’t toooo skeevy?

      Yes. But probably because I look at porn, I would take it to mean I’m telling my friends what porn I’m looking at. Whereas they are doing it to show each other that they’re not looking at any porn at all.

    • Buelldozer
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      People showing up at our doors to ask what we’re looking at online to make sure we’re living the word of Jesus.

      What? That’s not really happening is it?

        • Buelldozer
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          I’m in America and have never witnessed people going door to door asking to check your Internet history!

            • Buelldozer
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Have you lived in Utah?

              Nope, I’m in Wyoming. We have lots of Mormons but they haven’t, as of yet, taken the place over.

              Here we aren’t even allowed access to porn sites and now they’re shutting down access to most social media sites also.

              That seems like a bit of an over statement. My understanding is that you CAN access porn sites but that an age verification requirement will go into effect next year. Same with Social Media stuff, minors can still get access but they’ve got to get parental permission. To be clear I don’t agree with either of these but it’s not like Utah is rebuilding the Great Firewall of China and clipping access completely.

              There is no “democrat” option, you can’t register to vote unless you register as a republican.

              Now hold on a minute. That CANNOT be true, Utah not only has an official Democratic Party but there’s Legislators who belong to it!

              You go against the church here, they will utterly ruin your life as they are in control of all the media and all the banks and news outlets.

              I’ve heard that one before and don’t doubt that it’s true.

        • Buelldozer
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          but missionaries show up and ask if we’re making sure we’re doing the “lord’s work” on our computers.

          I’m so glad I don’t live in Utah.

    • @rchive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Just like random neighbors doing random checkups on people, or like they know somehow what you’re looking at and are confronting you about it? Those are pretty different.

  • donuts
    link
    fedilink
    381 year ago

    So God is a supernatural, omniscient, all-seeing entity that can speak directly into your mind, but you still need to pay a company $20/month to snoop on your devices for “accountability” so that you don’t look at all that very tempting gay porn on the internet.

    Ok…

    • @agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Ah yes, makes total sense. Similarly… The universe stretches to unfathomable distances, countless trillions of stars, and the god of all this … somehow cares whether you jack off to porn or not. Riiiiight.

      • @Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Actually, no.

        The universe stretches to unfathomable distances, countless trillions of stars, and the god of all this … somehow cares about you at all.

        This would be like you caring about an ant. I’m not talking about ants in general. I’m talking about you caring about one specific ant, located in one specific anthill, in a cabin in the middle of the woods. In Russia. To the point where you’ve written an entire book on how that ant should be living its life.

      • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Look, God created Mike Johnson in their own image, and that image is a man who has a healthy obsession with girthy, throbbing cocks. Sometimes more than one. Usually more than one.

  • @Machinist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    371 year ago

    Former fundie here. Y’all are probably misinterpreting what is going on.

    Mike Johnson is a True Believer™ from what I’ve seen. Doesn’t mean he’s not a terrible person, but his motives and actions aren’t necessarily as simple as repressed urges to view gay porn.

    The most likely explanation is that Mike Johnson’s son was watching porn and got caught, probably more than once. He probably admitted his guilt early on, but he attempted to hide the activity. So, not only do you have the kid for sexual immorality but you’ve got him for dishonesty. After hours of lectures at the boy - involving his mother, father, possibly clergy or youth leadership - the poor kid is probably swearing on a stack of bibles that he sees the light and will never do it again. That’s not good enough. He can’t be trusted as this isn’t the first time.

    This passage was probably pounded in bone deep:

    Matthew 5:

    27Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: 28But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. 29And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. 30And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.

    So, the boy should rip out his own eyes and cut off the hand he jacks off with. Maybe he should castrate himself. If the behavior continues, he’s willfully hellbound. Doesn’t he understand?

    So, Mike Johnson, wonderful paragon of fatherly leadership, says they will both install this software. That way he can prove what a good person he is and bear the cross of his son’s sin. See how great he is? He’s helping the boy with his problem. Barf.

    So, now the kid’s ‘sin’ is making national news and impacting his father who is a Great Man™.

    Christian guilt in a nutshell.

    I really feel for the poor bastard. Hopefully he makes it out from under the shadow of his father’s insanity. It’s truly evil shit.

    • @joel_feila@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Yeah thats all fine, scratch that. That’s probably cirrext but dies nothing to stop the national security risk.

  • BeautifulMind ♾️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s one thing if you want to subject your personal/private online life to a sort of virtual panopticon, but if you want to also look at classified material while also letting your morality cops peep over your shoulder, that should be disqualifying. Under no circumstance should a device with spyware on it have access to anything like classified material

    • @rosymind@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      241 year ago

      Agreed. What also bothers me is that he admitted to having his 17 year old son be his accountability partner. He really couldn’t find anyone else? It had to be his underage son? That’s weird, yo

  • @Evotech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    231 year ago

    If you need to buy a 200usd/year service to make sure you don’t look at gay porn you are definitely not gay

    • @Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sounds like you’re just sitting there with all that gay porn that could be freely browsed at anytime. You sure you’re not the gay one? With all that hot, sweaty gay porn that is only a click away. The temptation waking you in the middle of the night. Stopping the blood from rushing to your penis every time you think about it.

      God you’re gay.