• zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    We don’t don’t need princes or kings doing PR. If we taxed billionaires out of existence we could fund that and so much more. This guy doesn’t get to make up for whatever he was doing on Epstein’s plane, at least not without coming clean first.

    • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      We could do so much more, but would we? USAID was just shuttered. There’s every chance that money would go into the military industrial complex or something equally unpleasant.

      Not defending billionaires as a concept (they shouldn’t exist, and most aren’t as philanthropic as Bill), but I will acknowledge he’s doing a lot of good with his money.

      • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If we had been taxing billionaires for the last 50 years, the education system wouldn’t be where it is now and USAID would have never been under threat. In fact USAID would have probably never had to operate within the US.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      So if we tax them on wealth they doesn’t exist. Do we tax regular folk on the cost of their houses also? I mean they are worth billions but not till they sell.

      • Don_alForno@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        If your wealth is enough to serve as security for a credit line that you use to fund your daily spending, it’s enough to be taxed.