db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Luigi Mangione@lemmy.world · 23 days agoIt's a pin joblemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square379linkfedilinkarrow-up12.14Karrow-down116
arrow-up12.13Karrow-down1imageIt's a pin joblemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Luigi Mangione@lemmy.world · 23 days agomessage-square379linkfedilink
minus-squareWelt@lazysoci.allinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·22 days ago doesn’t convince me it can’t be true That sounds like backwards logic - you’re postulating guilt based on the lack of evidence of innocence (if I’m understanding your point correctly.
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·21 days agoYou’re not. I’m not saying he’s guilty. I’m just saying that it’s silly to imply there’s a conspiracy or something just because some of his alleged actions seem abnormal, when cherry-picking which of his actions you’re looking at.
That sounds like backwards logic - you’re postulating guilt based on the lack of evidence of innocence (if I’m understanding your point correctly.
You’re not. I’m not saying he’s guilty. I’m just saying that it’s silly to imply there’s a conspiracy or something just because some of his alleged actions seem abnormal, when cherry-picking which of his actions you’re looking at.