• Welt@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    doesn’t convince me it can’t be true

    That sounds like backwards logic - you’re postulating guilt based on the lack of evidence of innocence (if I’m understanding your point correctly.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You’re not. I’m not saying he’s guilty. I’m just saying that it’s silly to imply there’s a conspiracy or something just because some of his alleged actions seem abnormal, when cherry-picking which of his actions you’re looking at.