• ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If the goal is more publicity rather than the aid that had a low chance of making it through, it is very smart to have a world famous influencer aboard.

    Why do you assume she endangered the others rather than they chose to take a calculated risk?

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      So she reduced the chance of successful delivery in order to secure publicity in the near certainty that the aid could not be delivered?

      Maybe just me but that doesn’t seem like a good strategy.