• aleq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Isn’t librewolf building on the latest versions of firefox or gecko or something? So if firefox does, so does librewolf?

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yep, that’s the problem with browsers. They cost so much to maintain that their primary contributors are earning money through other means to keep the projects going. Gecko and Chromium are open-source, backed by Google money on both ends, but even then almost all of the non-corporate browser projects are just forks of one or the other.

      Other than Safari, which is closed source and only on Apple’s walled garden, Ladybird is the only non-Chromium, non-Gecko browser I can think of, and it needs a LOT of work.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a fork, so they can choose what to incorporate from Mozilla or not. If they go “bad” at anytime I’ll just switch again.

      • Feyd@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The point is that librewolf is downstream of Firefox. They are not equipped to maintain an entire browser if Firefox goes the way of the dodo

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Prolly not… But we gonna have to have a real convo about future of Firefox. It can’t die. Fuck mozilla but the peasants gonna need to come with some money and it to people who can maintain a proper fork. Otherwise we are all fucking cooked.

          I know there other engines cooking but they immature and at this point either mozilla gets its act together (it won’t) or ff will need to be forked with FOSS values. We have to pay to make it happen.