• werewolfborg@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    No. I think almost all of his executive orders have been things only congress does. No one is really stopping him from pumping hundreds of them out whether or not they’re even allowed to work. Also, he’s trying to pressure a private company through executive order in this case. They can say “fuck no.” And they should say “fuck no.”

    • Photuris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Judges can and have been issuing rulings “blocking” Trump’s actions. But he ignores those rulings and keeps on going.

      At some point, push will come to shove; meaning, these judicial rulings will have to be enforced, somehow.

      There’s not really a good vehicle for enforcing the law on rogue presidents. Unless someone is willing to physically arrest and detain him, possibly muscling past secret service in order to (attempt to) do so, they won’t be enforced at all.

      If someone will be willing to enforce the law, and can successfully do so, the Constitution may be saved.

      If not, we de facto have a king, regardless of de jure court rulings.

      • floo@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s kind of the problem with the courts is that they have no enforcement mechanism. They rely on the executive branch consenting to their ruling, not flipping the bird at it. The only recourse at this point is for Congress to impeach him. We all know how that would go…

      • Rodneyck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        And thus enters the fine line of being a tyrant. I never vote for the two-party/uni-party system, but is quite amusing to see the outcomes destroy democracy from both sides. Amusing in the most terrifying way.