Yeah, there’s no point in engaging with anything you just wrote, because you’re very clearly dedicated to whatever this wonderful and deep narrative is that you’ve crafted. But I will point out one thing you said that’s so very obviously wrong.
All of your ad hominems
I didn’t make any ad hominems. You see, almost every person who has ever cried that in an argument has had no idea what an ad hominem actually is. If I say “you’re wrong because you’re an Argonian, and you can’t be trusted”, that would be typical Imperial racism and also an ad hominem. But if I say “you’re wrong, because your arguments suck. and also, argonians have stinky fish breath”, that would be classical Imperial racism, but would not be an ad hominem. An ad hominem is an attempt to refute an argument by using a personal attack. It is not, as is commonly believed by internet keyboard warriors the world around, merely a personal attack.
Oh, and if you’re going to call someone a nazi, at least make it someone the average person would believe is a nazi. If I was anything of the sort, I personally know three admins of my instance who would not hesitate to ban me in an instant, and one or two of them could probably dox me if they wanted to.
Normally I would just mock you by pointing out that liberals stay in the tweets while leftists get out on the streets, but you’re obviously suffering from mental illness
Here’s an ad hominem and ableism. Your refusal to debate the argument here is a fallacy and bad faith.
and I don’t think it’s very nice to make fun of people who are clearly having a mental breakdown, judging by your totally normal reaction.
2nd instance of ad hom and ableism in this comment alone.
As for BRICS,
Thanks for reminding me you failed to answer any questions and lost this debate completely.
Also, hey @antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com, turns out it’s uh checks notes BRICS that’s censoring Wikipedia to convince you not to drink your own pee.
Strawman, that was never said. I also have a longform comment to that user already explaining why the science of the pee drinking stuff is bogus, so somehow you did a double strawman.
Yup, bunch of totally normal people in these comments.
3rd instance of ad hom and ableism
Now for this comment.
you’re very clearly dedicated to whatever this wonderful and deep narrative is that you’ve crafted
That’s literally just having integrity and debating a position. You can’t argue because you don’t know how to argue this topic in good faith and apparently too childish to admit it.
and also, argonians have stinky fish breath
This is an ad hom, it is being used in an argument to strengthen your side, and further, you are basing the entirety of your refusal to discuss in good faith on ad homs in the previous comment.
you’re wrong, because your arguments suck
This is also a fallacy and bad faith argument, it would be dismissed. Circular reasoning.
An ad hominem is an attempt to refute an argument by using a personal attack
That’s what you did. Literally. Don’t gaslight. I quoted it so you can see. You then changed the exucse to not argue in good faith in this most recent comment to lack the ableism, which is why it looks hilarious, like you’re upset I’m able to argue and think.
Oh, and if you’re going to call someone a nazi, at least make it someone the average person would believe is a nazi
You are one or you support them which makes you one.
If I was anything of the sort, I personally know three admins of my instance who would not hesitate to ban me in an instant, and one or two of them could probably dox me if they wanted to.
Really bad application of appeal to authority - fallacy. Lemmy mods dont determine who is a Nazi lol
Lol, I don’t cause you to argue in bad faith (with entire comments full of fallacies), that’s you who does so of your own “brainpower.”
You’ve not once made a valid counterargument or even provided evidence. What evidence? The only content I’ve seen is your ableism and ad hominems. Can you actually form an independent, good faith argument backed with valid evidence? I haven’t seen evidence of THAT being able to happen yet.
Again, you seem to think Lemmy mods are in charge of who is and isnt a Nazi, that’s so strange lol. But I dont usually report to mods, I’m an adult who can handle an argument (are you?). I also am an adult who can read what people write and form opinions about them, without needing another adult to intervene or tell me how to think. Maybe that’s your issue? No mod or big friend to tell you how to argue in good faith here?
I don’t need to provide any evidence? You’re the one making claims, the burden of proof is on you. Nobody has to do any work to disprove claims YOU’RE making.
EDIT: somebody just pointed out your profile to me, the whole bluesky thing, and the fact you joined on april 1st, and I can’t believe I fell for it for so long. I’ll admit it, this was peak level trolling, I got jebaited lmao. kudos, you are an epic prankster.
Removed by mod
Yeah, there’s no point in engaging with anything you just wrote, because you’re very clearly dedicated to whatever this wonderful and deep narrative is that you’ve crafted. But I will point out one thing you said that’s so very obviously wrong.
I didn’t make any ad hominems. You see, almost every person who has ever cried that in an argument has had no idea what an ad hominem actually is. If I say “you’re wrong because you’re an Argonian, and you can’t be trusted”, that would be typical Imperial racism and also an ad hominem. But if I say “you’re wrong, because your arguments suck. and also, argonians have stinky fish breath”, that would be classical Imperial racism, but would not be an ad hominem. An ad hominem is an attempt to refute an argument by using a personal attack. It is not, as is commonly believed by internet keyboard warriors the world around, merely a personal attack.
Oh, and if you’re going to call someone a nazi, at least make it someone the average person would believe is a nazi. If I was anything of the sort, I personally know three admins of my instance who would not hesitate to ban me in an instant, and one or two of them could probably dox me if they wanted to.
Here’s an ad hominem and ableism. Your refusal to debate the argument here is a fallacy and bad faith.
2nd instance of ad hom and ableism in this comment alone.
Thanks for reminding me you failed to answer any questions and lost this debate completely.
Strawman, that was never said. I also have a longform comment to that user already explaining why the science of the pee drinking stuff is bogus, so somehow you did a double strawman.
3rd instance of ad hom and ableism
Now for this comment.
That’s literally just having integrity and debating a position. You can’t argue because you don’t know how to argue this topic in good faith and apparently too childish to admit it.
This is an ad hom, it is being used in an argument to strengthen your side, and further, you are basing the entirety of your refusal to discuss in good faith on ad homs in the previous comment.
This is also a fallacy and bad faith argument, it would be dismissed. Circular reasoning.
That’s what you did. Literally. Don’t gaslight. I quoted it so you can see. You then changed the exucse to not argue in good faith in this most recent comment to lack the ableism, which is why it looks hilarious, like you’re upset I’m able to argue and think.
You are one or you support them which makes you one.
Really bad application of appeal to authority - fallacy. Lemmy mods dont determine who is a Nazi lol
Removed by mod
Lol, I don’t cause you to argue in bad faith (with entire comments full of fallacies), that’s you who does so of your own “brainpower.”
You’ve not once made a valid counterargument or even provided evidence. What evidence? The only content I’ve seen is your ableism and ad hominems. Can you actually form an independent, good faith argument backed with valid evidence? I haven’t seen evidence of THAT being able to happen yet.
Again, you seem to think Lemmy mods are in charge of who is and isnt a Nazi, that’s so strange lol. But I dont usually report to mods, I’m an adult who can handle an argument (are you?). I also am an adult who can read what people write and form opinions about them, without needing another adult to intervene or tell me how to think. Maybe that’s your issue? No mod or big friend to tell you how to argue in good faith here?
I don’t need to provide any evidence? You’re the one making claims, the burden of proof is on you. Nobody has to do any work to disprove claims YOU’RE making.
also, your fallacy is the fallacy fallacy. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy
EDIT: somebody just pointed out your profile to me, the whole bluesky thing, and the fact you joined on april 1st, and I can’t believe I fell for it for so long. I’ll admit it, this was peak level trolling, I got jebaited lmao. kudos, you are an epic prankster.