• Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    18 hours ago

    What if it’s not happening that much and this is just a shoe horn to get legislation to destroy benefits? What if most states already remove some purchases from the EBT/food stamp total?

    It’s like drug testing for welfare. It’s sounds like a good idea until you realize it costs millions, produces almost no results and the government performing said drug tests can’t be bothered to not do it in s corrupt way?

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Unlike means testing, it will cost nothing. You just update the list of what is covered. Then it’s forever banned from food stamps

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        as someone else pointed out a specific example that comes up regularly (this is apparently already how it works): 1 particular brand of peanut butter was available, but their lite version wasn’t… with a cart full of groceries, figuring out exactly what gets paid for with what or what needs to be put back isn’t a fast process… this takes not only the persons time, but the cashiers time and everyone behind them in the queue

        these are things we call negative externalities: costs forced to other places in the system without being accounted for in price

        there are many, many, MANY more costs associated with any government program and intervention but this specific example would cost the country as a whole far more than the occasional unhealthy snack