- cross-posted to:
- funny@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- funny@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
I’m horrified…
“I know we cut off both your arms, and while that may seem inconvenient at first, it’s a good thing because we helped you lose weight!”
anything to avoid criticising an idiot
Yes we know MAGAts black is white, up is down and the Orange Turd is a genius. We don’t don’t believe you.
Ignorance is strength, war is peace, freedom is slavery.
France is bacon.
I thought it was Chris P Bacon…
It could be Chris P Rat.
Terry Prachett approved.
France is bacon.
Knowledge is power
Nods in silent agreement.
If you live in the US and are not wealthy, stock up on rice, beans, lentils, and spices now. As much as you can reasonably afford. You will be glad you did.
Don’t forget mouse traps and other ways of keeping them safe from vermin.
And then later, catching and eating the vermin.
Urban pigeons and rats are definitely NOT a safe food. They’re full of chemical pollution that you can’t cook out, and probably more than a few diseases which you might also catch. It beats starving to death, but you should consider basically anything else, including boiling your (vegetable tanned) leather belts and shoes.
Pigeons are actually a domesticated animal that used to be bred for (among other things) food. So you re-domesticate a few of them, and then eat their offspring which you feed household scraps.
You might also save on heating in the winter by having larger cattle in your house and sleeping on a loft above them.
Oh yeah, you can totally eat pigeons, and people do. You can totally eat rats (and I assume some people do). But those aren’t the ones you randomly spot eating garbage in the cities.
I remember a tour guide in Paris showing me a poster from the Siege of Paris by the Prussians.
Dog meat, pigeons, rats, etc.
Honestly I’d just do what Napoleon III did and just sit in the field and wait to get hit at that point.
I imagine a late 19th century rat or pigeon had a much healthier diet than a modern one. Just be sure not to touch the lungs too much…
Ah fuck, I just threw a dead mouse away a couple weeks ago. I’m gonna be kicked out of the community for wasting food soon. 3 people could’ve ate with that.
Look at this fat cat.
Build a garden box or two if you can afford it. Stupid easy to build and they can be fun.
Domestically produced food shouldn’t go up that much.
Our domestic food supply is critically dependent on a number of tools and spare parts that will no longer be easily obtainable. A lead time of 6-7 weeks is the difference between a good harvest and no harvest at all.
When all of the regulations go out the window, affordable or not, food quality is going to slide into the dumpster.
Quality maybe but there’s no reason domestically produced food should go up a lot. The fact that China refused tons of pork and soy beans imports from America means there will be a glut and that means terrible finances for farmers but hardly expensive food.
In the short term, maybe but next season they simply wont produce either.
There is not infinite processing capacity so much of that will likely go to waste.
I’ve already seen prices go up considerably at basically any grocery store I’ve been at. Capitalists will continue to increase the prices regardless.
You think grocers will pass the savings on?
The fact that China refused tons of pork and soy beans imports from America means there will be…
huge, unexpected profits for groceries?
Some naive shit right here.
terrible finances for farmers but hardly expensive food.
So close to figuring it out…
For this current season specifically there will be a glut of food and not enough buyers. In the future if these farmers go out of business then prices could increase.
deleted by creator
If your competition cost more then you can raise your prices too!
Most food in the US is domestically produced, so no. The US is a huge exporter of food outside of specialty goods and tropical things.
You’re not giving capitalism enough credit. Corporations and businesses are not altruistic. If they can get away with slowly raising prices to increase profit margins, they will.
That’s a hell of a lot easier to actually achieve when you don’t have foreign produce acting as competition and consequently sanity-checking domestic prices. Foreign suppliers implicitly set a ceiling for how much a product can cost since the market would shift to using them if they became the cheaper option.
To make matters worse, tariffs are a very nice excuse for retailers to raise prices across the board using the excuse that “it costs us more to get it, so it has to cost you more to buy it.” If we’re lucky, they’ll raise foreign goods by the exact amount they’re paying more for them and only choose to raise domestic good prices (for profit) by only some fraction of that amount.
For basic stuff like rice the US produces way more than it needs, the only real imports I see are for specialty stuff like jasmine rice or bhasmati rice from Thailand or India. Basic long grain rice or calrose is domestic and very cheap.
It’s literally how capitalism works, so yes. They don’t care if it’s “mean.” They will ALWAYS price things as high as they can, and they will push it as far as they possibly can before sales start to dip.
If it’s a publicly traded company, they will literally oust you as CEO if you aren’t doing this because you’d be leaving money on the table.
It will anyway, prices never really went back down after covid for a reason
If the value of money goes down, prices go up.
The dollar is internal and farmers make annual purchases so they will have already bought their stuff they need for this season so they shouldn’t be too affected by exchange rates. The US makes its own oil and derivatives like fertilizer and farm equipment so they shouldn’t be too affected for now.
The dollar is internal
What does this even mean? You think the US has complete control over what the dollar is worth? Because that’s utter nonsense.
Either a bot or: Tell me you played sportsball in a small town highschool without telling me you played sportsball in a small town in highschool!
Whoever let gave you a passing grade in economics only did it so you could ahoot the game winning 3 point score.
There is more supply than needed, we normally make so much we export huge quantities. How does restricted food exports increase prices domestically?
The comments about capitalism and price gouging and stuff are all fine and correct. But that would logically apply whether the exports were restricted or not. But they have to do something with all the food they were going to export or not. Sometimes they’ll just burn it or dump milk but they can probably sell, just at a lower price or pay more to ship it farther away. Now long term yes if these farmers go out of business then prices could increase if the supply shrinks but that doesn’t really apply to this year.
The problem with the reasoning I see here is that you lot are taking things you heard and applying them to this situation, but you just say capitalism and that’s the end of your argument. Supply and demand still affect prices, especially on a large scale and with commodity goods.
Not a crazy thing to say if you don‘t particularly like the USA which I have to assume he doesn‘t.
Or you’re an environmentalist who knows we’re literally cooked.
Pretty sure he likes Russia more.
Removed by mod
We had a 22 percent increase in domestic investment.
That’s good, it really is, but that in and of itself doesn’t mean much. Industrial production left the US for a reason. What’s changed? The cost of living has only gone up, especially housing, which means the cost of domestic labor is still going to be much higher than many other countries, so how do these US producers plan to turn this new capital investment into a profitable enterprise? How are they going to profitably produce quality goods that Americans can actually afford? Are they only going to make luxury goods for the highest income Americans? If so, who’s going to serve the middle and the bottom income levels?
It is precisely like when Russia’s currency tanked like a stricken submarine, which meant their PPP-adjusted GDP shot up the rankings and became one of the highest numbers in the world, which all the tankies promptly seized upon and used as an example of why the sanctions are actually helping Russia, by boosting its domestic economy, which is why everything is going great.
The sanctions on Oil and Gas certainly were helping Russia because they are lacklusterly enforced but drove up the global prices, benefiting Russia.
By half assing sanctions, the EU and US helped bankroll Russias war chest in 2022.
Goal of the sanctions was to fund US oil/lng extortion profits so that they could fund GOP and climate denial. PPP GDP is not really boosted by currency devaluation. Even if costs are stable in Rubles, the GDP is in USD, and Russia has had high inflation due to high military pay, and labour needing high wages as alternative to joining military.
Thing is the article says the actual domestic investment growth was 9.8%, not 22%.
Inventories was also most of that. Means less production in future quarters.
exactly, that boost was to delay the inevitable crash that just around the corner
Maybe slave labor. Or possibly something that actively steals wealth. Like, buying out mortgages then telling families to triple up in the house to cover less food and higher rent. Basically whatever you can imagine that makes things worse for most of us is probably the plan.
If so, who’s going to serve the middle and the bottom income levels?
Certainly not the government!
who’s going to serve the middle and the bottom income levels?
And laughter ensued from the 1%
For the billionaires planning on buying everything up to finish Russiafying our Oligarchy it’s a great thing.
That’s because all bad news is fake news now, everybody deserves the freedom to choose their own truth! /s
I expect that Navarro will be needing to do a “high prices are good news” bit once stockpiled goods in warehouses in the US also run dry.
If Trump thought that this statement would be a political winner, I suspect that he’d be doing it himself, rather than having Navarro doing so. Right now, the only thing that Trump’s currently seeing net positives in the polls I’ve most-recently seen is his immigration policy. Not on the economy.
Yeah good news for his boss Putin the rest of the world not so much.
Peter Navarro is a quak
So is Ron Vera.
Blyat!
