Kendrick Lamar enters the tech space with a collaboration on the Light Phone 2. Light phones offer minimalistic experiences without apps or color.

  • @Fisk400@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1461 year ago

    They all sold out and they are all packed in one dudes garage. The actual sale of them will take place over the next year over a series of ebay auction, as is tradition for limited edition things.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    681 year ago

    It’s $299, which isn’t ridiculous for a phone, but this is kind of gimmicky with its Magic 8-Ball thing and, of course, its celebrity backing. I don’t know, I guess it’s not the worst price point, but considering you can get low-end Android phones for that with more functionality, I’m also guessing the people buying it are not really worried about the price.

    • @designatedhacker@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      441 year ago

      Why not get a phone that can take, send, and receive pictures and video. It would also have maps, GPS, encrypted messaging, streaming music, audiobooks, e-books, home automation apps, ride hailing, food ordering, decent browser, etc.

      Then, stay with me here, don’t install social media apps. The lengths people go to so they can avoid social media when it is extremely avoidable is crazy to me.

      • @Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        What you’re doing here is subtly shifting the burden of phone addiction from software companies and phone manufacturers back onto end users.

        You’re glossing right over the fact that these teams have the very best software engineers, mechanical engineers, marketers, ad people, psychologists, and doctors for the purpose of making these endlessly scrolling apps as addictive and hard to avoid as possible.

        I read your comment and think about the people who say “why are you depressed? Just go lift some weights. It all comes down to you”

        • @designatedhacker@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          161 year ago

          It’s more like “Why are you smoking cigarettes, stop buying cigarettes.” It’s addictive, well marketed and cool, and totally avoidable with some self discipline.

          I wouldn’t joke about people with an actual illness by telling them to toughen up, but we’re not talking about that.

        • R0cket_M00se
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What you’re doing here is subtly shifting the burden of phone addiction from software companies and phone manufacturers back onto end users.

          I thought you were being satirical at first but then I realized you genuinely believe an individual has zero personal responsibility whatsoever. Lemmy is filled with children.

          This isn’t the housing market or alcohol, just don’t install or doom scroll social media. Jesus Christ, nanny state garbage.

        • aubertlone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          Are you being serious?

          Yes, saying “don’t install social media apps if you don’t like them” is the same as saying “lift weights to stop being depressed bro”.

          Your brain is too advanced and I cannot follow the steps you took to reach this conclusion.

        • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 year ago

          That’s flat out false. Other than using messenger to chat with family, I haven’t had to use Facebook for anything for the 5 or so years since I stopped actively using it.

          As for “everything passes through Google”, that’s just an optional login protocol and a shitload of blockable ads.

          Also, Google isn’t social media. You could argue that YouTube has social media aspects, but those aren’t mandatory for internet participation either.

          • @onion@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Well you do have to go a bit further with a degoogled rom to get rid of google

    • Afghaniscran
      link
      fedilink
      English
      341 year ago

      Shit, you can buy a phone for £15 and I bet it’s got snake on it

      • @agent_flounder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Make 100,000 of that phone and it will cost a lot closer to £15.

        The bulk discounts on components and the PCB itself are pretty huge once you get up into the 10,000 qty. I’ve never had that pleasure. Only thing I’ve been involved with was a few hundred units.

        Do a run in the 100k range and I imagine you’re calling chip makers directly and making some insane deals.

        But at only 250 units your PCB and expensive components like display and shell will still be quite expensive.

        • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is a Litephone 2 with a logo etched on the back. I don’t know their overall numbers, but it’s not just the 250 for this marketing gimmick.

    • sab
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      I mean, you’re quite clearly paying for the lack of features here.
      Which makes the 8 ball even dumber.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Yeah, the 8 ball bothers me, as does the ‘it’s a dumb phone, but you can add a bunch of apps,’ which is… a regular smartphone with no apps installed for the most part. The e-ink screen is unusual and interesting for a phone and I can see the appeal there, but the rest is kind of odd.

        I’m guessing the majority of the phones were bought by people who are big fans of Kendrick Lamar. I sort of understand. An (impossible) equivalent to me would be if Stanley Kubrick came out with some piece of tech. I’d be sorely tempted to buy it just because I love Stanley Kubrick.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            The minimalistic phone has no web browser and its screen is paper-like similar to that of some e-readers. In its simplest form, you can call, text, set an alarm, and use it as a hotspot, but there are add-on tools that include a music player, notes, a calculator, directions, and more.

            Sure sounds like you can to me.

            • @applejacks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              many dumphones have these functions.

              calculator and GPS is not what most people think of from the phrase “a bunch of apps”

    • @alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      331 year ago

      It is. Which is why it is so stupid that a company like Nokia or Motorola doesn’t spend a little more on market research to totally own this market.

      Or, maybe they did and partnered with Kendrick Lamar behind the scenes.

      • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        maybe they did and partnered with Kendrick Lamar behind the scenes.

        Litephone has been around for a while.

    • Bloody Harry
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      more like 6 dollars on the BOM, would sell for 30 doll hairs to the consumer, tho

  • 👁️👄👁️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Considered this phone but couldn’t commit to something like that, nor can I justify such a price tag for that. Instead I’m attempting to dumb down my phone. Moving to GrapheneOS and starting from the basics is definitely a good starting point.

  • @lea@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    I hate minimalism! This is a dumb phone that got rid of everything that made dumb phones charming.

    • @PancakeLegend@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      I love minimalism, but dumbphones are not functionally minimal. They do less and seem “simple”, but you’re offsetting necessary utility elsewhere. Mostly they require making compromises that don’t need to be made if not for a little self-control.

      A simple black rectangle is perfectly minimal. How you set them up is everything.

  • chirospasm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have owned the Light Phone 1 and the Light Phone 2 – both were built with the intent to stay connected in a handful of ways without needing to have a full-spec’d, app-heavy, typically-sized smart phone.

    If the intent and the vibe make sense to you, then it is a wonderful approach for a more ‘minimalist’ device: you can go outdoors, travel, hike, camp, etc., without having a smart phone to pick up and play with. I dig it.

    If the intent and vibe don’t make sense to you, the Light Phone may not be a good fit.

    I really like the device, and use it often enough as a daily driver on weekends. Always glad to see some public attention on it.

    • @agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not for a run of only 250.

      Edit: I should have explained that I was referring only to economies of scale in manufacturing of electronics. Making only 250 of some electronic device means a much higher per unit cost than if one made 10,000 of the same thing. You can look at quantity discounts of microcontrollers or sensors or things like that ok Digi-Key or Mouser and see what I mean.

      • @small44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I expect something really special for special editions not a blandly designed phone endorsed by a celebrity

        • @agent_flounder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Yeah it’s a pretty meh phone. I couldn’t possibly give less of a fuck about a celeb name attached to it, personally. It might make sense to make 100,000 units of a minimalist phone with no celeb b.s. so it would be super cheap. This, however, just seems ridiculous.

  • Senex
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Let’s be honest, he could sell poop in a ziploc bag and his fans would buy it.

  • TomMasz
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    I hardly text and your call is going to voice mail. Phone things are not the reason I have a smartphone. I’d be happy with an updated Palm Pilot with connectivity.

    • @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Oh, how I miss my Treo. If only they made a next Gen, with a new OS that had backwards compatibility for Palm apps, which were tiny and used little power.

    • @breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      How/what are you going to sideload? It doesn’t run android from what I can tell, so anything you would want to install would need to be developed first

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Why does color matter? My dumb phone in the 90s had a color screen.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Maybe, but with the rest of the description, I’m guessing you’re still talking about a battery life in terms of a significant number of days. I also wouldn’t be surprised if a tiny, low-end LCD color screen was cheaper than an e-ink screen.

          • @agent_flounder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Yeah I think you’re right; color lcd are usually quite a bit cheaper than eink at least in small quantities without talking direct to manufacturers. They use a lot more power though since eink only uses power when changing and none otherwise.