cm0002@lemmy.world to Firefox@lemmy.world · 2 days agoIs It Worth Killing Mozilla to Shave Off Less Than 1% From Google’s Market Share? - Open Web Advocacyopen-web-advocacy.orgexternal-linkmessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up169arrow-down17cross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.io
arrow-up162arrow-down1external-linkIs It Worth Killing Mozilla to Shave Off Less Than 1% From Google’s Market Share? - Open Web Advocacyopen-web-advocacy.orgcm0002@lemmy.world to Firefox@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square30linkfedilinkcross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.io
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·2 days agoI always see the same developing browsers is hard sentiment. But if it’s not true, why hasn’t a completely free open source volunteer team created a popular usable browser yet?
minus-squareMonstrosity@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·2 days agoThere are other open source browsers/engines. Aside from that, Imo, it’s not cheap to do what Mozilla is doing, but 1/2 billion annually is probably more than enough. I believe thar be grifting in them waters.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoThat’s happening right now: https://ladybird.org/
minus-squareDamage@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 days agoI mean, all those WebKit browsers are descended from Konqueror, which was free and open source. But those were different times.
I always see the same developing browsers is hard sentiment. But if it’s not true, why hasn’t a completely free open source volunteer team created a popular usable browser yet?
There are other open source browsers/engines.
Aside from that, Imo, it’s not cheap to do what Mozilla is doing, but 1/2 billion annually is probably more than enough.
I believe thar be grifting in them waters.
That’s happening right now: https://ladybird.org/
I mean, all those WebKit browsers are descended from Konqueror, which was free and open source. But those were different times.