What a giant mango baby
Next: Trump asks FBI to discover who shit in his pants
I bet it’s the same millionaire paying off the protestors! Elon will get him one day…
He knows he’s tanking. This is just a way to distract the dumbass base that believes in flat earth and unicorns.
Anything that Trump doesn’t like is either done by paid protesters or considered political acts.
But his cultists will accuse anyone else of being brainwashed.
What a weak, piece of shit, loser.
Smells like BITCH to me.
Article says Trump believes he has a 99.9% approval rating on the border issues…
He is delusional
Trump has said pollsters that have shown his approval ratings sliding in recent weeks should be investigated for “election fraud.”
He’s going to run for a third term. That’s what this means. Buckle up, y’all. We’re in for yet another Constitutional crisis that the Democrats will do exactly nothing about.
There is A LOT of anti Trump activity going on. Don’t ignore it.
The man attempted a coup and faced zero consequences for it. In fact, he was rewarded with a second term as president. Forgive me if I refuse to hold my breath for Democrats to do anything substantial to prevent him from wiping his ass with the Constitution.
What you aren’t mentioning is all of the corruption of SCOTUS and the Republicans at the state level that facilitated his success. The Dems did A LOT to expose them… the American people believed the lies and the state governments went along with the coup.
Please explain to me why then the states did not just ignore Scotus, or use there constitutinaly, scotus garenteed rights to determine who the state electors vote for, and order that they could not vote for trump, a thing that is allowable without saying no to the court.
and before you say that a state cannot just ignore the supreme court, need I remind you that right now the president is, and we have had it done by county clerks refusing marage licences before.
The laws on the state and national side would prevent such action generally speaking. POTUS is breaking laws. That simple.
and I am asking what the hell is a law, more than words on paper we all agree to follow, If the stakes where as dire as was being said, why the hell did we stay following them, the choices where simple, use your right to direct state electors to under no circomstance cast a vote for said individual, or to contenue to follow your interpritation, the plain text of the document you say you care for and say you have an oath to. Laws do not have mystical power to force someone to follow. At the war crime trials “I was just following the law/orders” will not be a defence. Chose your side and stick to it
Examples? Nevermind
Strongly worded letters will be written, perhaps sent!
But not too strongly worded, that would just be rude, must maintain decorum.
What a clown.
Please show some respect, that’s not fair to clowns
The call is coming from inside the house.
I AM SO
FUCKING
TIRED OF
THIS LITTLE
WHINY BABY
BITCH BOY.
-Poetry, 2025 Edition
Not enough AI generation.
I’m going to go out on a limb and say that I understand that Trump might be confused about this. He isn’t doing anything that he didn’t specifically say he would do when he was asking for people’s votes. They loved him before the election. They loved voting for him. I can understand why he might not believe that suddenly they don’t like him. Somewhat the same for Musk except he started crashing back with the purchase of Twitter so he should have had time to understand that he was driving his fans away the further right-psycho he got.
One of the rhetorically effective things about his campaign messaging was how broad and vague it was. Pundits, podcasters, influencers, and those manipulating the algorithms of social media, took that messaging, isolated parts of it and recontextualized those parts for specific audiences.
So while he may have assumed he was being very clear about what he was going to do, the messaging many of his voters got was totally detached from his intentions.
A good example of this is people who thought that the tariffs would somehow be a tax levied on foreign countries, not a sales tax on imported goods. Or those who thought the tariffs would be targeted at specific goods categories to benefit their particular industry, not a blanket tariff that impacts their upstream supply chain.
He told his subordinate on the campaign to get voters to vote for him, he assumed that meant convince them he was right, but that was impossible, the only ones that could get him the numbers he liked were the ones who just twisted what he said till people agreed with it.
He isn’t doing anything that he didn’t specifically say he would do when he was asking for people’s votes. They loved him before the election. They loved voting for him. I can understand why he might not believe that suddenly they don’t like him.
This is what happens when you steal an election
The data behind that conclusion is compelling to those who understand both statistics and technology. Most of the US Congress has repeatedly shown that they have neither the capacity nor the inclination to understand either.
Shhh don’t tell him let him figure it out for himself and then lie about it.
I looked for the link to The Onion. I think I audibly sighed when I didn’t find it.
You didn’t eat the onion, you regurgitated one
The link does go to Newsweek, though, which is not exactly the most credible source either…
President Donald Trump has said pollsters that have shown his approval ratings sliding in recent weeks should be investigated for “election fraud.”
Responding to the polls, Trump wrote on Truth Social on Monday: “They are negative criminals who apologize to their subscribers and readers after I win elections big, much bigger than their polls showed I would win, loose a lot of credibility, and then go on cheating and lying for the next cycle, only worse.”
It’s not an election, and I hurt myself reading that deeply moronic quote. How is this man in charge of anything?
“negative criminals”, lol.
How is this man in charge of anything?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0Z9IpTVfUg tl;dw: people confuse action with leadership.
I think of Donald Trump and Elon Musk, masters of aimlessness, crisis and noise, firing all those experienced people who have been quietly and competently managing government departments for years or decades. This only looks like progress to fools.
I mean, he is doing what he’s said he would and running the country like a business. Which often results in paying yourself a huge bonus and making a lot of experienced workers redundant.
Unfortunately all of his past businesses have failed horribly.
That was really a master class, I haven’t seen one of those in awhile. He used the story technique to make you feel dumb for falling for these busy looking leaders. It was dramatic in comparison. I’m seriously impressed.
So you’re completely correct. Progressives and Democrats, in general, are boring. Magas go around with coal burning trucks, racist outbursts, laws that usually go after the “other.” How do the progressives and democrats go after that sweet, sweet, comparison story without looking like dipshits.
Great video, thanks for posting.
Isn’t there a diffrence between lose and loose?
Yes. Trump can’t spell.
Feel like that should be a federal offense, zero excuse why POTUS should ever publish a misspelled word with the resources at their disposal.
after I win elections big, much bigger than their polls showed I would win, loose a lot of credibility, and then go on cheating and lying for the next cycle, only worse.
Did he admit to lying and cheating there?
Not sure whether you’re joking, but no, the subject of “loose [sic] a lot of credibility, and then go on cheating and lying” is “They” from the beginning of the sentence. Surprisingly, the whole thing hangs together grammatically.
