• WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Yes and they used to have that in the U.S. as well, but surprise surprise! If you put an authoritarian in power, who delights in being cruel and punishing people, you tend to lose some of those precious rights.

      • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.eeBannedBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Then maybe you shouldn’t vote on such candidate. It’s hard to protect every single law from being twisted when you elect some kind of

        • WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          Well, I didn’t vote for anyone in the U.S. since I don’t live there.

          But my point is, non-authoritarians wouldn’t even suggest sending their own citizens to foreign prisons/camps. It’s cruel and unnecessary and it doesn’t solve the root of any issues. It’s just offloading your problems onto someone else.

      • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.eeBannedBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        As I said not really. What I am talking about is semi related

        It’s a general trend lately around the world to send immigrant prisoners away but I argue about making it nationality agnostic

        Why should we only send away immigrant offenders when we can send all offenders somewhere?

        This way we can avoid racism accusations