IO 😇@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 个月前spectrum rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square34linkfedilinkarrow-up1619arrow-down15
arrow-up1614arrow-down1imagespectrum rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneIO 😇@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 个月前message-square34linkfedilink
minus-squareGinny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·6 个月前You’re assuming gayness is both integral one-dimensional and integral. Personally, I think gayness is homomorphic to the set ℝ².
minus-squareborokov@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·6 个月前You’re right, I’ve mixed denombrability of the set and sortability of the measure (don’t know if it is the right words in engkish). On my side, I’m not sure about dimension or continuity of gayness norm.
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·6 个月前According to that logic, straightness would be heteromorphic to the set ℝ². Destroyed by pure logic
minus-squarevrojak@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 个月前So instead of general gayness, you have an axis for twink attraction and bear attraction?
You’re assuming gayness is both integral one-dimensional and integral.
Personally, I think gayness is homomorphic to the set ℝ².
You’re right, I’ve mixed denombrability of the set and sortability of the measure (don’t know if it is the right words in engkish).
On my side, I’m not sure about dimension or continuity of gayness norm.
According to that logic, straightness would be heteromorphic to the set ℝ².
Destroyed by pure logic
So instead of general gayness, you have an axis for twink attraction and bear attraction?