• HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    250
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    That’s cool.

    When I was an intelligence analyst in the military I witnessed the President of the United States ignore the entire intelligence community when they indicated to him that there was no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the September 11 attacks and there was no evidence of any weapons of mass destruction programs in Iraq.

    Then I saw that same administration fabricate intelligence indicating the contrary

    Then I saw that same administration blame faulty intelligence when no WMDs were found, blaming the entire intelligence community in the process

    They somehow managed to ruin the entire IC’s credibility when they were right to begin with

    That was pretty unbelievable

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      150
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      When I was an American I witnessed an obvious Russian agent get elected… twice, and destroy the standing of the US completely.

      • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        82
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        It is also unbelievable that the hundreds of thousands of dead in a war built on a lie in Iraq pales in comparison to the millions around the world that will die because of Trump’s cuts to USAID alone

        Trump can kill off millions without even starting a war on false pretenses

        Like his own personal global Holodomor

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the September 11 attacks

      I was a kid during all that, but my recollection is they didn’t directly try to claim that he did? It just seemed like the country was swept up in the patriotic “glass the middle east” fever and went with it because murica fuck yeah, and it was part of the GWOT, but the messaging was all “evil dictator wmds etc.” and not “saddam did 9/11.” Though I was probably in high school before I could even articulate the difference between Iraq and Afghanistan, so I could be mistaken.

      • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        9/11 and Iraq: The making of a tragedy

        Twenty years after the al-Qaida attack on September 11, 2001, the United States is still involved in a war in Iraq that it started. President George W. Bush was obsessed with the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and deliberately misled the American people about who was responsible for the 9/11 attack.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Afterward, Bandar told me privately that the Saudis were very worried about where Bush’s obsession with Iraq was going. The Saudis were alarmed that attacking Iraq would only benefit Iran and set in motion severe destabilizing repercussions across the region.

          New headcanon, Bush knew the Saudis were behind 9/11 and invaded Iraq specifically to fuck them over. /s

          Interesting read though. The 80% number believing Iraq was involved is not surprising to me, I just didn’t realize the bush admin actually pushed that narrative.

          • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Bush 100% knew the Saudis were behind it, so not sarcasm.

            The US wanted a base in the Middle East that wasn’t SA, and Iraq was an easy target. They didn’t care about destabilization. That was a perk. It was all about force projection from a central base.