• buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t want Waltz anywhere near the presidency.

    I would definitely vote for AOC any day of the week though.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well I want a team that can win. Other people do like Walz; Harris’ popularity spiked with that announcement. The campaign then hid him under a rock because he scared donors.

    • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Even though AOC is one of the rare American politicians that I like, it’s probably not the best idea to make her the presidential candidate. Simply due to the fact that she’s a woman. The last few dem losses make it clear that America is still very sexist.

      • alkbch@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Kamala Harris was one of the most unpopular primary candidates in the 2020 primary, if not the most unpopular; Somehow that didn’t discourage the Democratic Party from anointing her in 2024.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Is it because they were women? Are you sure it wasn’t because they were borderline Republicans? Both Clinton and Harris are two of the most conservative democratic candidates to run in the last 30 years.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Well keep running women and keep coming up with excuses in why they loose besides admiring America is sexist.

          • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Democrats: Run two of the most establishment, conservative, uninspiring candidates possible from their party; each with a laundry list of controversies and shady practices.

            You: They must have lost because they were women!

          • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Maybe if we ran an actual fucking liberal for a change.

            Biden actually ran as a liberal and didn’t try to court the Republicans. Even though he’s got a long-term track record of voting for all the things Republicans love. Not to mention he ran basically a Reagan era White House. All the while being called the most liberal president we’ve ever had. Meanwhile Harris ran as a super conservative neoliberal. She embraced the war criminal Dick Cheney and refused to go on record as opposing the war on Gaza. Clinton steamrolled the entire Democratic party to take to nomination by force and then walked around pretending to be nice all the while spitting out conservative talking points.

            The entire Democratic party is a fucking joke. And until progressives decide to shed the Democratic party and run as progressive independents instead we’re going to continue to have this shit show.

      • kofe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m in some circles that would never support her because she sat down with Hasan Piker. I would absolutely support her, but she’s pretty polarizing. Same was said of Bernie despite him having one of the most successful grassroots attempts in history. Blows my mind that because they’re populists they’re immediately discounted by some, even though the positions they support are the ones we desperately need.

        Forgive my rant, but just because Trump is a populist with us vs them rhetoric does not make them equal by any fucking stretch of the imagination, and it drives me insane that the friends I’m thinking of are so blinded by the label.

      • Elextra@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I unfortunately believe it may play some role too for some voters. There are Americans who still embrace their cultures, where there is an emphasis more on men being in charge. Think of some middle eastern cultures for example. And of course, there’s the sexists.

        Sad reality also is there is a lot of racism still within our country…

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Simply due to the fact that she’s a woman. The last few dem losses make it clear that America is still very sexist.

        Democrats really are willing to shut out all women as soon as a progressive woman is suggested.

        • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          The mental disconnect American liberals have with reality is staggering. Clinton and Harris did not lose the elections to Trump because they were women. They lost because they were unlikeable corporatist democrats that enabled genocide and supported the American oligarchy over the American people, and that was obvious to everyone with a brain.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            They act like biden won with a decisive majority that gave centrism a mandate instead of barely squeaking in. It took days to be certain. That was far too close and democrats acted like everything was fine and that they could easily beat trump and still move to the right like they wanted.

            • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Because those Left of center tend to stay home and roll over for fascists at the ballot box, despite it being a betrayal to all vulnerable people. The Right has their religious leaders and other authority figures making sure that the vote and promising to oppress vulnerable people.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            The same things can be said about Biden and Obama, at least as far as where they are on the spectrum.

        • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I’ve heard Republicans talk in the wild… You really, really underestimate how misogynistic people are. We’re close but right now we need certainty. I think a woman VP is the best bet, and I would HATE To relegate aoc to the nothing that is VP. Give it another 8 years before running aoc imo

          • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            The kind of Republicans that would never vote for a woman are also the kind that would never vote for a Democrat.

        • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          There may be other reasons, but US has never had a woman president. Ever. I don’t think this is the time to risk it again. Maybe if the dems win once and do well, they can try pushing for AOC next.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Maybe if the dems win once and do well, they can try pushing for AOC next.

            There’s always some excuse why a progressive can’t run.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                It’s neat how pragmatism always involves waiting an additional few decades to do anything other than field “we’re second worst to nazis and that’s it” candidates.

                • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  I don’t make the rules. US is deeply racist and sexist. There isn’t much we can do to change it overnight. Trying to push an ultra progressive candidate will simply mean losing the election. I’ll love to see Bernie or AOC as the president, but most Americans think that they’re Communist, and that’s somehow a deal breaker to them.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 days ago

                    Trying to push an ultra progressive candidate will simply mean losing the election.

                    We’ve had three cycles in a row of running dull conservatives against evil conservatives. One of them won, yes, but by the skin of his teeth. How many more cycles of losing to fascists are we gonna need?