• Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think it’s incredibly important that people know, with absolute certainty, whether or not the new Mozilla/Firefox privacy policy in any way applies to / covers such a service.

    I’m not saying I know the answer- What I’m saying without a concrete, permanently applied answer it’s not even considerable.

    • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      There is no email service that exists without a terms of use and privacy policy. I still feel everyone overreacted about Firefox. It’s funnier how many people said they switched to Brave because of it and all the super shady stuff Brave has done.

      • britaliope@kourjetez.bzh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        7 days ago

        at exists without a terms of use and privacy policy. I still feel everyone overreacted about Firefox. It’s funnier how many people said they switched to Brave because of it and all the super shady stuff Brave has done.

        Being angry at the Mozilla foundation for those changes is understandable. Switching to Brave because of it is plain stupid.

        • Sequence5666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I do think the brave devs or teams starting spreading the “switch to brave” as a growth hack. No right minded person would pick brave over ff. Maybe librewolf sure.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        7 days ago

        Firefox/Mozilla operated without any of the new additions for nearly the entire history of the internet until this year. If anything, “over”-reacting to the new policies was too weak a reaction. You do you and all, but I’ll agree to very strongly disagree.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      You can’t know that with absolute certainty. Sorry, but if you’re using someone elses server for your communications and they’re not end to end encrypted, you should just assume that they can and do read your emails, and act accordingly.

    • SaltSong@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      What is it that you’re concerned about? Assume that I have no idea what either the new or old Mozilla privacy policy is, please. I tend to assume that all such are a pack of lies and everything is spying on me.

  • Tea@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Out of all the articles and the official release announcement, you could share, you shared forbes which violate people privacy.

    Why?

  • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Thunderbird Pro will apparently be:

    This email thing plus Thunderbird Send (which is basically https://send.vis.ee/), Thunderbird Appointment - a scheduling tool and Thunderbird Assist, which is:

    “…at least for now, being cautiously labeled as “an experiment” that will allow users to take advantage of AI features within their email. However, the goal is to be lightweight enough that the language models can be run locally on a user’s PC in the interest of privacy. This service is being developed in partnership with Flower AI, which leverages Nvidia’s confidential compute to provide private remote processing in the event a user’s PC isn’t powerful enough. Sipes emphasizes that any remote processing features attached to Thunderbird Assist will always be optional, in the interest of ensuring complete user privacy.”

    So AI shit that nobody asked for or wants.

    • SaltSong@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      This covers my thoughts about damn near every “helpful” feature this side of auto-complete email addresses.

      • mke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        They said it will be opt-in and are trying to make it local-first. Their provider(?) apparently allows fallback to nvidia cloud compute when the hardware can’t handle it.

        I’m not using AI to write my fucking emails, regardless. Just wanted to let people know.

        p.s. Sorry, I’m dumb, skipped over quote in parent comment. Point is, there’s more to the service than optional AI bullshit, and you shouldn’t have to disable it.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      "[…] This service is being developed in partnership with Flower AI, which leverages Nvidia’s confidential compute to provide private remote processing in the event a user’s PC isn’t powerful enough. Sipes emphasizes that any remote processing features attached to Thunderbird Assist will always be optional, in the interest of ensuring complete user privacy.”

      That’s a lot of words to say “we made an AI that totally won’t suck up your data, trust me bro”

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        “nvidia’s confidential compute” had me choke when reading it. Sure bro, sure.

    • freely1333@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      This sounds like proton except I haven’t heard a thing about cost or encryption which leads me to believe you will pay with your data and there will be no encryption.

      Proton is the bare minimum for email services. Email should be fully redone at its core.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    welp I signed up for the waitlist.

    I’ll use it for a disposable email at first, and if it endures and does well I’ll move my main shit off to it.

  • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m listening…

    But how is a small non-profit going to afford a free email service? Ads in every email?

    • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Based on what I’ve seen in their forums it will be a paid service. I think it will be free at first for beta testers but I assume they are targeting people who currently use services like Proton.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Here’s what I want… I leave a computer on at home and it checks my email. I get emails from it at my phone. No setup. Make it work like Sinkthing used to work. I don’t want cloud anything. Fucking backup nightmare where my shit ends up kidnapped by a company for monthly ransom.

  • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I hope to god one day the developers at Mozilla finally get tired of this shit and fork everything under a new org.

    Fuck off with more services and give me my integrated FTP client back. No one who uses Mozilla software wants more cloud shit or online services from Mozilla.

    • mke@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      No one who uses Mozilla software wants more cloud shit or online services from Mozilla.

      I don’t think that’s unanimous. I’d like to use Firefox Relay, myself, and I’m willing to give thundermail a chance.

      Used to think I’d go full Proton eventually, but leaning more towards a diverse set of service providers, nowadays. It’s also my hope that these services allow Mozilla to depend less on companies like Google, and more on the users they ought to serve, which would be healthier for the org and better for users.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’d consider it. If they host things outside of the US/start moving operations overseas, it’d be a lot more interesting. I sub to Proton for email, VPN, and drive support. Still hoping someday for proper Linux drive support so Mozilla/Thunderbird can target that

    • mke@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes, sort of. Thundermail addresses, apparently, or bring your own. From the linked article you’re commenting on:

      Users can send and receive email using new Thundermail accounts they sign up for. The service will also allow using your own custom domain (e.g. your.name@yourdomain.com).

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        You have always been able to use your own domain email with Thunderbird. The big news here is the fact that they are launching not only a web based mail service a la Thunderbird but also providing an email server for addresses of [yourchosenname]@thundermail.com. which is gonna be pretty great.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          I assume they mean that you can use your own domain with their email server.

          I.e point your MX records to them.

          Of course you always could use your own domain in their email client. It would be a pretty shitty email client otherwise.

        • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah, but the Thunderbird client… ain’t great.

          And yes, I’m a Linux nerd since 2003. Thunderbird’s client sucks.

          That said, I hope this is successful.

          • imvii@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’ve been using Thunderbird for email for years. I use it with some SMTP servers on shared hosting platforms, a yahoo account and a few gmail accounts - one with calendars. I don’t have any problems with it. Runs stable, doesn’t crash or do weird things. My only complaint would be search is a little clunky, but it works.

            I had to use Outlook client for year at another job and that client was hot garbage.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Whats wrong with the thunderbird client.

            Even when I was on windows back on XP I used it. Never had a problem with it or its functionality, personally.

            • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Nerds like us can figure it out.

              But it’s hardly user friendly. I’m not going to get into the minutiae, but Joe Blow could probably get it to fetch, and send, but the user interface options like font size, etc., blows. Typical nerd “It’s good enough for me, RTFM, losers.”

              And I’m too old to fuck with things for fun. I want it to just work, and I’m not paying Apple prices for that, or supporting Microsoft’s eventual SaaS subscription model, which WILL eventually happen.

            • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              For Linux, I can’t think of another user side client. I use web based.

              So, I’m happy to see Mozilla get into that arena.

            • Patch@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Depends what you’re after. I’m a Thunderbird user, but if user friendliness is the aim then Geary is quite good.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Doesn’t like 90% of Mozilla’s funding come from Google? At least expanding their paid services could be seen as trying to turn that around.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      From my understanding thunbird is somewhat separated from this. From the article linked by OP it says:

      What’s crystal clear is that Thunderbird’s ever-increasing donation revenue (currently its sole source of income) is allowing for some explosive growth that’s long overdue. To add some context to this, Thunderbird received $2.8 million in donation revenue during 2021. Two years later, in 2023, it received $8.6 million in donations. I’m told that total financial contributions for 2024 were even higher, though the final amount hasn’t been officially released.

      • mke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I should donate again. As someone who still depends on gmail, I keep forgetting how annoying it was to get ads every time I refreshed my inbox, before I switched to their app. Glad things seem to be working out.

        • Sips'@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          It is extremely easy to switch email providers these days. I’d suggest start by setting up a forwarded mail box between Gmail and whatever new mail provider you choose. Then slowly but surely start using the new email address instead of Gmail and change the most important accounts to the new one.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Sounded great until the “assist” ai feature. I friggin hate Gemini in gmail so any other kind of ai is an automatic nogo for me