return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 个月前The Atlantic publishes full Signal chat messages showing military plans about U.S. strikes in Yemenwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1452arrow-down14cross-posted to: usa@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1448arrow-down1external-linkThe Atlantic publishes full Signal chat messages showing military plans about U.S. strikes in Yemenwww.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 个月前message-square37linkfedilinkcross-posted to: usa@lemmy.ml
minus-squarenjm1314@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 个月前Reasonably secure for the average consumer, not for intelligence work.
minus-squareqprimed@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 个月前oh, agreed. these people should have been nowhere near it - as evidenced by their incredible fuckup. as an average consumer, and barring binary or device compromise, I do trust signal and a few others to traffic info that could incarcerate or worse.
minus-squareidiomaddict@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 个月前To be fair, it’s also not secure for the average consumer, if they accidentally add a journalist to their gc
minus-squaresome_designer_dude@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 个月前Intelligence work also requires intelligence. These people would be using AOL Messenger if it were 2005.
Reasonably secure for the average consumer, not for intelligence work.
oh, agreed. these people should have been nowhere near it - as evidenced by their incredible fuckup.
as an average consumer, and barring binary or device compromise, I do trust signal and a few others to traffic info that could incarcerate or worse.
To be fair, it’s also not secure for the average consumer, if they accidentally add a journalist to their gc
Intelligence work also requires intelligence. These people would be using AOL Messenger if it were 2005.