You must log in or register to comment.
Basically the government knows that AI is the next big weapon and is trying to ensure it can’t be outcompeted.
Every one of these policies is designed to allow the military to copy the best technology for free and prevent opposing militaries from doing the same.
How is giving wrong info and furry porn a weapon?
“Wrong info” – you mean the potential for an infinite and omnipresent amount of targeted propaganda?
Have you seen
?
Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn’t work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
For real, we were all genuinely shocked and a little freaked out when we accidentally started predicting the future with a nontrivial degree of accuracy in the winter of 2022. Geopolitical shitposting shouldn’t be able to serve as anything even remotely close to an Oracle… and yet here we are.
Predicting the recent resurgence of neofascism doesn’t require AI, nor is it remarkable that AIs have noticed it. Both were long predicted and have been widely speculated and commented upon.
That does not require any new policy, such policies existed for long time around technology. And I am sure the military has its own versions of KillGPT4 for a while.
So
A. The government installs agencies to prepare them if they need to step in and regulate AI.
B. Those agencies are also in charge of finding new ways to use AI for the government benefit.
Hello 1984. It’s obviously nothing dangerous short-term but I can’t say I’m a very big fan of either one of those line items.
