• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        He persecuted socialists (basically the first people sent to concentration camps) and had capitalist policies? Any reason to suggest he was fond of Marx?

        But Mr (assumed) “proletarians_must_suffer” probably thinks that “socialism is when the state does stuff”.

        Go bother someone else in some ancap forum, where you belong.

        • proletarians_must_suffer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          He persecuted socialists

          Are bolsheviks socialist? Bc they also persecuted socialists, communists, anarchists, etc, etc.

          and had capitalist policies

          He literally limited the profitability of companies to 6%.

          Any reason to suggest he was fond of Marx?

          He’s non-marxist socialist. Not all socialist are Marxists. Btw, fascists are Marxists. They’re what you call “revisionists”.

          Go bother someone else in some ancap forum, where you belong.

          I’m not an ancap.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Are bolsheviks socialist?

            No. They were state-capitalists.

            He literally limited the profitability of companies to 6%.

            You agree that companies made profits. That’s a capitalist policy.

            He’s non-marxist socialist. Not all socialist are Marxists.

            I didn’t say whether or not he was a Marxist. All socialists apply Marxist analysis at least partially. Even Bakunin agreed with Marx’s theory.

            Btw, fascists are Marxists.

            🤡

            I’m not an ancap.

            You’re enough of an ancap for me to care how you define yourself. You’ve proven enough how little of political/historical understanding you have.

            • proletarians_must_suffer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              No. They were state-capitalists.

              Ok.

              You agree that companies made profits. That’s a capitalist policy.

              Considering what was before, it was a gradual step towards socialism. Nazi Germany existed for like 30 years. Not everything can be implemented immediately.

              All socialists apply Marxist analysis at least partially

              Uhuh. Is Charles Fourier socialist?

              You’re enough of an ancap

              What is that even supposed to mean?

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Considering what was before, it was a gradual step towards socialism. Nazi Germany existed for like 30 years.

                Ah, yes. And Hitler clearly stated that he was a socialist… somewhere. You have to read between the lines of “Mein Kampf”, where he clearly states that he’s right wing. And all the companies who profited immensly from all that slave labour where juuuust about to be socialised. /s

                Uhuh. Is Charles Fourier socialist?

                Got any proper points, or are you just gonna “umm actually” me to death?

                What is that even supposed to mean?

                You’re a weirdo who deserves to be ridiculed for having such a stupid worldview.

                • proletarians_must_suffer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Ah, yes. And Hitler clearly stated that he was a socialist… somewhere

                  I didn’t say it. Although he did.

                  You have to read between the lines of “Mein Kampf”, where he clearly states that he’s right wing.

                  Where?

                  Btw are bolsheviks communists? Bc they clearly stated they are. No need to even read between the lines.

                  And all the companies who profited immensly from all that slave labour

                  And what’s the relation between capitalism and slavery?

                  Got any proper points, or are you just gonna “umm actually” me to death?

                  The point is that socialists can be socialists without applying Marx works in any way.

                  You’re a weirdo who deserves to be ridiculed for having such a stupid worldview

                  What worldview? What is my worldview?

                  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I didn’t say it. Although he did.

                    Where? Here, maybe, where he ridicules the people who think the Nazis were socialists?

                    Wie oft haben wir uns geschüttelt vor Lachen über diese einfältigen bürgerlichen Angsthasen, angesichts des geistvollen Rätselratens über unsere Herkunft, unsere Absichten und unser Ziel. Wir haben die rote Farbe unserer Plakate nach genauem und gründlichem Überlegen gewählt, um dadurch die linke Seite zu reizen, zur Empörung zu bringen und sie zu verleiten, in unsere Versammlungen zu kommen, wenn auch nur, um sie zu sprengen, damit wir auf diese Weise überhaupt mit den Leuten reden konnten.

                    Where?

                    In this chapter, for example

                    Btw are bolsheviks communists? Bc they clearly stated they are. No need to even read between the lines.

                    They stated that as their goal. The Nazis stated a Reich enuring 1000 years as their goal. Did those succeed?

                    And what’s the relation between capitalism and slavery?

                    They’re compatible.

                    The point is that socialists can be socialists without applying Marx works in any way.

                    Name one socialist that came after Marx that doesn’t agree with him in some manner or the other.

                    What worldview? What is my worldview?

                    Please, enlighten me. I could do with a bit of absurd fantasy worldbuilding.