Came across this publication today and found it interesting. Abstract

Animals discharge feces within a range of sizes and shapes. Such variation has long been used to track animals as well as to diagnose illnesses in both humans and animals. However, the physics by which feces are discharged remain poorly understood. In this combined experimental and theoretical study, we investigate the defecation of mammals from cats to elephants using the dimensions of large intestines and feces, videography at Zoo Atlanta, cone-on-plate rheological measurements of feces and mucus, and a mathematical model of defecation. The diameter of feces is comparable to that of the rectum, but the length is double that of the rectum, indicating that not only the rectum but also the colon is a storage facility for feces. Despite the length of rectum ranging from 4 to 40 cm, mammals from cats to elephants defecate within a nearly constant duration of 12 ± 7 seconds (N = 23). We rationalize this surprising trend by our mathematical model, which shows that feces slide along the large intestine by a layer of mucus, similar to a sled sliding down a chute. Larger animals have not only more feces but also thicker mucus layers, which facilitate their ejection. Our model accounts for the shorter and longer defecation times associated with diarrhea and constipation, respectively. This study may support clinicians use of non-invasive procedures such as defecation time in the diagnoses of ailments of the digestive system.

  • Ghostalmedia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    258 months ago

    TL;DR:

    Some scientists said “I wonder how long it takes different mammals to poop.” Then they got stopwatches, started timing buttholes, and found that most mammals, big and small, take about the same amount of time when they shit.

    Science baby!

  • @mateomaui@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    108 months ago

    I see they did not work the sugar free haribo bears into their ejection model.

    Possibly too difficult to measure.

    • ivanafterall
      link
      fedilink
      28 months ago

      What do I need to eat to get a flow-rate equivalent to the Pitch Drop experiment?

    • CommunityLinkFixerBotB
      link
      English
      38 months ago

      Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn’t work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

  • @nodimetotie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    68 months ago

    I seriously wonder what’s the story behind this paper. It doesn’t sound like this is a question that naturally arose from the existing literature. In other words, WHY? I see that they actually have some interesting implications, i.e., the findings can be used as a diagnostic tool. But then they also have a theoretical model to explain the results. I gotta really love that stuff to go into such depths

  • Ghostalmedia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    58 months ago

    For this study to happen, people literally had to stare at many many buttholes and time them while they shat.

  • Sibbo
    link
    fedilink
    48 months ago

    Journal “Soft Matter” with a logo depicting a set of toilets. I like their style.