Do you think an European Citizens’ Initiative to ban Twitter in the EU would be beneficial and have a possibility of being successful?

I’m sorry if this is not a good community for this question. If not please point me to one.

  • nuko147@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    34 minutes ago

    I don’t like the idea of banning social media, newspapers, books, or news websites. Even if they go downhill like twitter. Just opting out and ignoring them, will do. If many do it, it will collapse by itself. But there must be a good alternative and that is difficult.

  • arifinhiding@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If the ban brings a new alternative in place, then yes. I’m not from the EU or the USA, but I’m used to Mastodon and Lemmy. I don’t mind non-american alternatives. The EU should have its own competitive social media for the rest of the world.

      • arifinhiding@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        Unfortunately, as I understand it, Bluesky has an identical algorithm with Twitter. Ive lost patience with how American-led technology has taken the world’s attention for granted. What I had when I was on Bluesky was reading the same information being viraled and repeated, and the same prominent users from Twitter absorbing almost all of my attention. Bluesky promoting the same users since 2010 made the world smaller for me and I’d rather be on Mastodon where smaller creators are somewhat boosted. Moreover, spaces on Lemmy are teaching me a lot about the European Union, and since I’m an outsider and I don’t live in the west, I deeply enjoy being educated rather than sensationalized with the same conspiracy theory. I firmly believe there’s a larger world than what an American-led algorithm often portrays. But, I acknowledge that everyone is different and I understand that they might still have preferences that are different to mine. Nonetheless, I still want an algorithm that actually shows me niche topics all around the world.

        • tfm@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 minutes ago

          The cool thing on bluesky is that you can create your own algorithms through custom feeds. Also to my knowledge the following feed is purely chronological.

          It’s surely not as decentralized and free as Mastodon but it’s heck of a lot better than the centralized platforms.

  • Tw4tnoM0r3@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    We should ban it for politicians. Why on earth would you use a for-profit foreign platform for official communication?

    • iwasnormalonce@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I wrote to my MP asking them to stop using it and to help to get other MPs off the platform. Everyone should write to their representativea in government asking them to do the same.

  • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This was the moment where banning twitter turned from a good idea into a non negotiable measure we need to take asap.

  • chmod755@feddit.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’d prefer tariffs on Twitter and Tesla in all EU nations until the Trump tariffs are removed --> income should be used to fund European social media and European car production

  • Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Depends what “ban” means. If it refers to them not being able to be commercially active in the EU because they violate EU regulations, sure. So no selling ads, no targeting ads, no selling blue check-marks.

    If it refers to preventing people from the EU to access their website through meddling with DNS or similar means, then i am against it. We should be able to access it, but they shouldnt be able to make money off it in the EU.

    • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I do agree.

      Some people might need access to those sites for various reasons (journalists making research, keeping in contact with friends overseas, etc.). But we ought to inform the european population about the dangers of using those services, and preferably move politics and country-specific communication (your local police station social media account) onto european solutions.

      Cutting off or limiting the profits which american megacorps can make off the european population does also sound like a good idea.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    X does not and will not comply with EU rules, and thus needs to be banned until they change (i.e. indefinitely).

    • vrojak@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I am also fine with escalating fines until the problems are addressed. Say, start with 1000$ and double that every week until they comply, either they do or there’ll be a lot of money.

  • Hikuro-93@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Not a twitter/x or bluesky user, never really my type of preferred social media. So I wouldn’t miss it.

    However we must realize the most crucial factor about X in Europe, the fact that it’s a clearly compromised and biased network, highly subject to corruption, division and disinformation.

    Would the average person participate and support X if it was owned by a russian oligarch? And that russian propaganda was quite obvious within the social platform?

    Some would, sure, but the majority would mistrust it and be far more critical about potentially false information.

    So yeah, it should be categorically banned from EU nations. Not because I hate it, but because of the dangers of division it represents to our society. Specially when for those who like X-style platforms there’s already “non-regime” alternatives.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I would rather the users all realize it’s a nazi bar and stop using it, but that’s never going to happen. Too many people are oblivious, don’t care, or are pro-nazi. Shutting down the nazi bar with the power of the state is acceptable to me.

  • vesi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Yes. Freedom of speech? There is no true freedom of speech there so limiting X is not a violation of it

  • turtl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Fuck Twitter but not sure a ban would be a good thing

    • starlinguk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Banning fascists instead of accomodating them is absolutely the right thing to do. It’s accommodating them that got us into this mess.