• azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Running Linux on closed source hardware. Classic.

      I bet you aren’t even using your own open RISC-V based SBC, with fully open-source peripherals. Is your computer monitor even running an open-source firmware or are you just a FOSS poser?

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Using computers with closed source biology. Classic.

        I bet you haven’t even engineered your own DNA-II, fully-sequenced, libre-licensed microbiome with open source biochemical pathways. Are your eyes even running an open-source neural firmware, or are you just a FOSS poser?

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Using computers with closed source biology. Classic.

          Hey now, biology is pretty definitively open source. Every generation produces small patches of varying quality (mutations) and for most organisms the source is freely distributed to create new builds (reproduction). I mean if no one is downloading your genetic repo that’s largely a you problem (natural selection) not a biology problem.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Using biology on closed source chemistry. Classic. I bet you didn’t even roll your own proton mass or bother configuring your own valence shells. Are you even running your own coulomb law policies, or are you just a FOSS poser?

          • rosco385@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I don’t have a witty reply, but these kinds of threads were the best part of reddit. So glad to have shitposters like you all here on Lemmy.

      • herrvogel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        No. You either go full Stallman and inject Gentoo directly into your aorta, or you might as well be deep throating Satya Nutella while bouncing on Tim Apple’s lap. Filthy casual.

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Agreed, OSS purity is silly. I am running an open source client (Thunder) to this open source service on my Pixel 9 running GraphineOS, the low level firmware is still absolutely proprietary.

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          Actually, to be clear, I don’t think FOSS purity is bad. I just mean that denigrating what others are doing because they’re using something non-free while they’re making steps in the right direction is dumb and counterproductive.

          To my mind, FOSS is the only way forward for a healthy, functioning society, and the fact that so much of our digital landscape is being gradually replaced with it is to me evidence of that. I think the end goal should always be pure FOSS, but that doesn’t (necessarily) mean immediately jumping to all FOSS; it just means taking steps to cut out proprietary software wherever you reasonably can.