geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 7 个月前Bernie Sanders gets fact checkedlemmy.mlimagemessage-square147linkfedilinkarrow-up1509arrow-down1104
arrow-up1405arrow-down1imageBernie Sanders gets fact checkedlemmy.mlgeneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 7 个月前message-square147linkfedilink
minus-squareGold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·7 个月前its whataboutism to point out a flaw in ones argument?
minus-squareRickC137@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down6·7 个月前Whataboutism is: “You said x but what about y?” Which doesn’t make x any less valid or problematic.
minus-squareanarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·7 个月前Implying that the US chooses foreign support on the basis of democratic principles is misleading at-best It’s like me telling my doctor that I have a glass of wine a day, even though I also have a bottle of whiskey a day.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down39·7 个月前Peak virtue signalling.
minus-squareformulaBonk@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down2·7 个月前Even if you disagree with what that guy wrote it’s not in any way virtue signaling. Like brother what?
Peak what-about-ism
its whataboutism to point out a flaw in ones argument?
Whataboutism is: “You said x but what about y?” Which doesn’t make x any less valid or problematic.
Implying that the US chooses foreign support on the basis of democratic principles is misleading at-best
It’s like me telling my doctor that I have a glass of wine a day, even though I also have a bottle of whiskey a day.
Peak virtue signalling.
Even if you disagree with what that guy wrote it’s not in any way virtue signaling. Like brother what?