• kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    His refusal to show up as the doctor for anything fan related, his own dislike for the show, etc. He’s a twat.

    • haverholm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      He played a character on a TV show 20 years ago. That doesn’t in any way obligate him to “show up as the Doctor” for fan events, nor does it indicate his “dislike for the show”.

      There is certainly a twat at play here, but it isn’t Eccleston.

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        He was like that even while playing the role, he’s been a twat for all 20 of those years. He refused to take part in the anniversary specials, he was a dickhead when he was on set according to people who worked with him. He’s always been a prick of an actor.

        • He grew incredibly disillusioned with the people running Dr Who at the time. Despite repeated attempts on his part to get people to treat others better, things never changed according to him. He also had a very poor working relationship with John Barrowman, who was repeatedly accused of sexually inappropriate behaviour (eg exposing himself to his co-stars unprompted, supposedly as a joke). Noel Clarke has also been accused of inappropriate behaviour.

          Eccleston did not want to work for people who in his view were responsible for the mistreatment of his colleagues on set. He was open to returning to the role, but never with those same people still in charge.

          On top of all that, he initially just shut his mouth when he left, not naming names. Then the BBC published a statement saying he was “overwhelmed by the tv shooting schedule” and that he was tired, which is killing for an actor’s career. He had a tough time getting roles after that, and basically was forced to work for American producers because nobody in the UK would touch him.

          Tennant mentioned that though their interaction was brief, Eccleston was very amicable towards him when Tennant took over.

          Eccleston can be petty, but it doesn’t seem like he ever was towards someone who didn’t deserve it. And given how the BBC and the producers mistreated him, he’s been shockingly fair imo.

        • haverholm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’ll find the general opinion of Eccleston runs contrary to yours, and manages to do so without the pottymouth.