Version 2 of the European app alternatives. Feel free to share it :)

  • prinzmegahertz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Peertube has this fediverse problem. You google it, go to the webpage and instead of getting a list of promoted videos, you get an explanation of what it is and a manual on how to actually join, starting with „select a pot“. You then get to search the list of pots that all have like 10 viewers and 5gb upload limit. I stopped at this point.

    That being said, i really would like an European youtube alternative, but not off the „provide your own hardware“ kind.

  • A_Porcupine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Here Wego is the worst maps service I’ve ever had the displeasure of using. Amazon used to use it for deliveries (maybe they still do), and it took almost a year to get it to recognise that my house was not 8 miles away on a completely different road. It messed up the Amazon routes as the route it picked was all in that same area, except my house, that was 8 miles away.

  • Dop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Where’s Signal (or molly if you need foss)? Signal is an non-profit organisation, so I’d say it can hardly be branded ‘from’ anywhere unless you’re talking about servers location but then…

  • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    As a musician, I don’t like SoundCloud. The free upload limit is way too small, their compression is not great and every time you do anything they try to sell you one of their subscriptions, which also cost way too much imo.

    If other musicians didn’t use it as much I would have already thrown it out long ago.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Calling Peertube a Youtube alternative is just wrong. It is an alternative in theory but it probably doesn’t even have a milionth of the content that Youtube has.

    • Buy-European.net@lemmy.caOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That’s the problem with “the winner takes it all” on the Internet. Which European alternative would you suggest instead?

      • 𝕨𝕒𝕤𝕒𝕓𝕚@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        12 hours ago

        There is no real YouTube alternative, unfortunately. The content makes a video platform great. No alternative video platform is anywhere close to YouTube in content diversity.

        It’s unfortunately a very different situation to most other things. For example you can “simply” convince your circle of friends to use Threema. Try convincing your favorite Youtubers to post on any alternative platform and see how far you get.

        • SeboBear@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I understand - my hope here would be we see „real“ content that is not clickbait optimized as there is no incentive on that

      • MTK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’m not saying PeerTube is bad, but if I was a regular person that wanted an alternative to YouTube, going to PeerTube would be an annoying experience that will probably turn me off from it. You have to let people come with the appropriate expectations.

          • MTK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            So? Again, peertube is great and I’m hoping it grows, but sending people ther as a YT alternative right now is just misleading, odyssey is much closer and even then I wouldn’t call it a real alternative yet.

    • "no" banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I told OP this in previous post; Spotify gave money to Trumps’ inauguration. That’s why it was removed.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Shameless plug for Navidrome

        Want your music, always available. No ads, no enshitification. Maximum quality, always reliable?

        There is only one clear winner for me.

      • Buy-European.net@lemmy.caOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        We learn and iterate. Thanks for the feedback! We still list Spotify in the database but plan to include quality factors in the (probably not so near) future as well to better differentiate between “European address” and “European commitment”.

          • Buy-European.net@lemmy.caOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            Production in EU, Production in Europe, Production outside Europe could be factors for example and is what I referred to as “European commitment” prior. “European address” would be minimum presence in Europe but formally incorporated there.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      but also platforms right wingers that had an impact on influencing our election. i get i shouldn’t be the one guiding boycotts of my own nation’s products, i’m just saying spotify has been antihelpful when it comes to the creation of this situation

  • NewDay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Unfortunately, the PeerTube community is inactive and small. There are basically no interesting videos at all.

    • CAVOK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      SepiaSeach will search a large number of instances for content. Not a bad start for peertube. But I do agree that it’s hard to find good content there.

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yep, as it doesn’t have a monetization incentive it will be never that appealing. There should be a way for authors to earn money.

      • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s not about monetisation. It’s about audience. Who is going to bother to host an instance and post to a platform where the most popular videos only get 100 views?

        • SeboBear@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Can not agree more. When I open YouTube and see the amount of clickbait previews, badly cut and created content and just copies left n right I loose all interest

        • 🇳🇱 Snoezelpoes@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It’s true that the monetisation of everything is pretty awful, but it’s one of the most important reasons to join a platform for content creators whether we like it or not.

          The main reason to join a platform for a creator is the amount of the potential viewers, which of course don’t increase much without new content creators. Therefore Peertube needs a secondary reason for creators to join, which it doesn’t seem to have.

          If anything, joining Peertube will in theory decrease their income, which actually gives them a reason to not join :(

          • nico198X@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            at this point in my life, i just can’t care about catering once again to capitalism. i’m basically out of that game and encourages others to do the same.

            youtube worked because it was fun to make videos for each other as a community. that’s what peertube brings back and i prefer it that way rather than the attention-addicted sickness it has become.

        • Mihies@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Monetizing leads to being able to pay bills. Don’t you think authors deserve being paid for the content if they wish so? Besides Google managing of youtube is cause of shittiness. Personally I would be fine with a subscription as long as artists get most of it.

          • nico198X@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            it doesn’t need to be built in. there’s already a section to add Support links.

                • Mihies@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Yeah, that does not and will not work, at least not on scale. Think about an average user - do you think he/she will donate to each video he/she watches, perhaps on TV? But if the model is a subscription one (think Netflix, Tidal, Spotify, heck, perhaps even YouTube and so on, with amount being fairly distributed to authors), then it just might work.

    • faultybit@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      25 minutes ago

      I wonder why you think so. Some like Peertube & Threema are definitely poor alternatives but I wouldn’t say it’s “almost all” either.

      • Deezer vs Apple Music/Tidal: Deezer has a great selection of music and recommendation algorithm. I’ve never used Tidal but Deezer is definitely better than Apple Music IMO.
      • Tuta/Mailbox.org/Posteo vs Gmail: Well, they all let you send and receive emails. Unless you’re an enterprise user, I don’t see what advantage Gmail would have over the others.
      • HERE WeGo vs Google Maps: Very recently installed HERE and didn’t have any issues so far. This can be a bit location-dependent though.
      • Ecosia vs Google: Ecosia uses Bing/Google1 as its search index anyway, so the results are almost exactly the same for me.
      • DeepL Translate vs Google Translate: DeepL has a more limited selection of languages but for the languages it supports, it’s the undisputed king.
      • Bolt vs Uber: I only used Bolt a few times while I was in Portugal and it seemed fine. Maybe this is also location-dependent.

      1I think it’s Bing by default but you can configure it to use Google in the settings.

        • Buy-European.net@lemmy.caOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          But I will be more than happy to replace them or add alternative in the next iteration of the infographic. What apps would you recommend?

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            I would reccommend further development.

            And as we arm the continent for war once more, as the US commits to isolationism and NATO abandonment, we might as well disregard any copyright issues preventing the implementation of important features. So while we might lose everything, we might finally get decent European elternatives for a brief period.