Summary

The Democratic National Committee and two other party committees have sued Trump over Executive Order 14215, which claims authority to seize control of the Federal Elections Commission.

The lawsuit argues this violates federal law and threatens free elections.

The order also claims power over other agencies including the SEC, FTC, and NLRB.

Democrats contend this executive overreach contradicts constitutional principles and a century of Supreme Court precedent upholding Congress’s authority to insulate certain agencies from presidential control.

  • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    THEY is the judge.

    Suppose you sued Bob, and Bob was dumb enough to openly defy the judge. The judge could write a court order that says “Bob owes Melatonin $1000” or “Bob owes the court $1000”.

    For all practical purposes, that order works the same as a check signed by Bob. If it’s written to you, then you and your lawyer can take it to the bank. The bank teller will give you $1000 and deduct $1000 from Bob’s account. It doesn’t matter what Bob says or what Bob’s employees say. The bank teller doesn’t work for Bob.

    The same is true if “Bob” is a DoJ lawyer or even the DoJ itself.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I would like to see how this works if the check is drawn off the president of the United States. I daresay, it’s going to be different, at least with this president.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The US has checking accounts just like everyone else. That’s how they write paychecks.

        And if a bank can draw from the US account when presented with a federal employee’s paycheck, it can do the same when presented with a court order.