Imagine being so wealthy that you sue over this.
Pro se means they’re representing themselves. Probably because of no money.
Possibly. Could also be a clue to their demeanor.
I missed the pro se part. This will go nowhere.
Nooo, this will show them, this will show them AI is usefull actually. He’ll win that case SO hard. Chatgipity is GOD, it can easily defeat a layer, just you wait.
/s
It’s honestly wild the state of things. I’m currently going through community college and they make you sign a thing saying you won’t use ai but it is written with ai and the only thing it seems the teachers actually make (the syllabus) has blatant ai generated images and text all throughout.
I mean… ask ChatGPT if it wrote the essays. Why would it lie?
There are some tip-offs when content is written by AI but good prompting or just rewriting can easily remove.
The university’s “five professors who subjectively agreed it must be AI” because they tried themselves sounds like something University would do. This just won’t hack it for future AI detection.
IMO these institutions need to make their peace with AI because all smart people naturally find fast ways to get things done easier.
