• samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Is it? I thought it was just an imitation of Twitter. In what way does it even pretend to be federated?

    • Genius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You can spin up your own Bluesky instance

      …which is still managed by the Bluesky central server and can’t connect to peer instances without that server.

    • scoobford@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      How else would you pretend to be federated besides saying you’re federated when you aren’t?

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Where did they say that? I’m not claiming they didn’t, I just haven’t heard about it.

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          So, non-federated means one company/organization has full control over some product/service/website (like Twitter, Reddit, etc).

          Federated means that individuals can independently run instances of some product/service/website, and all those instances can talk to one another and share/sync data (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc).

    • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      The tech stuff is above my pay grade but essentially my understanding is the code is open source and one could start their own server on the platform theoretically but no one does

      And yeah, a “federated” (but not in practice) Twitter clone