• kerrigan778@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You think too much of CA. CA is INCREDIBLY liberal, so much of CA loves her and worships the memory of Dianne Feinstein.

      • InvictusUmbra1824@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Trump got 38% of California to vote for him last year. We are nowhere close to “incredibly liberal”. Also I hate Pelosi.

        • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Undereducated people who can’t stand the cognitive dissonance of the liberal control of CA, paying lip service to issues that actually affect the working class while enriching the elites, restricting freedom and protecting the stability of the status quo above all.

          • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Pelosi has been a massive driving force in keeping the DNC from getting younger or less neo liberal. She has blocked committee assignments at every turn for more left leaning and younger congresspeople, most famously AOC. She is the head of the Democrat side of the absurdly corrupt insider trading gerentocracy of a Congress we have had for decades. The self enrichment is absolutely disgraceful, paying lip service to left wing causes while actively preventing meaningful left wing movement to take hold in the party and country. She and McConnell are two very effective leaders on either side of the same grifter coin perpetuating American neo liberal imperialism at the expense of the working class worldwide.

  • SabinStargem
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Term and age limits will be needed if the Constitution is improved, alongside ditching first-past-the-post voting. A great deal of America’s rot comes from the stagnation caused by career politicians who simply exist to occupy a seat.

    Sure, we might lose ‘wise’ leaders, but it has become pretty damn clear that archaic politicians are the plugged toilets of Democracy. All they do is cause a mess if not promptly handled. The Geronocrats must go.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It comes from citizens united as well. We are a country whose government runs on bribe money and little else.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The fact that this would’ve put Bernie out of a job years ago is a hard no for me. Campaign finance reform so we don’t have a bunch of corporate stooges in power, and getting rid of FPTP make more sense to me. Better alternative candidates will have a chance, as well as life-ling civil servants who are proven and lovee by their communities

      • SabinStargem
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        A neat person like Bernie doesn’t have to be a politician to do good works. He can help mentor grass root organizations. While it would be a shame to lose a good guy from direct politics, it is far easier for evil politicians to stick around if we don’t force them out. A good guy is apt to step down from power when they think it is right, but an evil one? They won’t leave until carried out in a coffin.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Fuck yes, let’s go with it!

      • Politician age range 30-50
      • Background check
      • Minimum Education Requirements
      • Understands science (including biology) and technology thoroughly at minimum high school level
      • 200 hours of community service working with the poor
      • 200 hours of community service working with the elderly
      • 200 hours of community service working with immigrants
      • Debt, Funding and Corporate Alliance check
      • Blocked from stock market trades along with immediate family
      • No bribes
      • No Lobbying
      • No ex C-STAFF for major companies.
      • Paid enough to be single yacht and a summer home kind of rich.

      What else we need in here or what have I gone wrong on?

  • TemplaerDude@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    12 hours ago

    All these fucking useless Democratic leaders are so selfish. You’ve failed and failed over and over again, miserably, yet you still insist on trying to lead? Do the right thing. Step down. Quit. It’s truly disgusting how they’ve strangled their party and country with their incompetence.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 hours ago

    That’s not surprising. The left has been looking for someone capable of primarying her for years.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    As long as one of them wins idc. If one of them loses the seat in the house then this is gonna be the fuck around found out portion.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Kick her the fuck out. Kick all the useless democrats out. Fuck all of them. They lost. They’re done. Go the fuck away.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    “I’ve got some news: I’ve decided to run against Nancy Pelosi to represent San Francisco in Congress. I know some of you might be surprised that Speaker Emeritus Pelosi is running again, but she is—for her 21st term!” Chakrabarti’s post read.

    I fucking hate boomers in political office. They refuse to let go of the reins. They want to hold on until death. Selfish.

    I saw a video last year asking people in the UK about USA politics and someone commented how old our leaders are.

    • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I think she is too old to be a boomer, that generation was 1946 to 1964. She was born 1940

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Meh, it’s not the age thing for me. And I don’t care if someone works until they choose to retire, as long as the people want them. I think ageism and the appeal to some magical term limits thing is rather useless.

      I hate just how disconnected her comment was about the insider trading. It’s infuriating. Republicans do it, too, but she somehow became the face of this.

      I don’t know that her or others like her are doing anything to bring up the next set of leaders, though. I also don’t really see her fighting for progress. The age thing, the number of terms - entirely secondary and honestly, it’s just red herring in my view. All one has to do is look at Bernie.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I think the age thing is a problem, if for no other reason than that very old politicians won’t have to live as long in the world that they create. Sure, for politicians of good faith, that wouldn’t matter much; but many of the ones currently in office would absolutely trade our future for their own temporary enrichment, knowing that they won’t be here when the chickens come home to roost.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Like I said, I think far too much time is spent on things that are really side-issues and red herring such as term limits and age.

          You could have someone in their 20s (or whatever the minimum age is for a given position) come in there, still do insider trading, still do everything for the sake of the owner-donor class and then go through that revolving door into a cozy job within the corporate world as a reward for doing everything they were told in their single term and it would still be a huge problem.

          Howling about someone’s age or how many terms they have served seem to just be a distraction from the real problems. To me, anyway.

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Yeah, so we need to plug all of those holes, too. I’m not saying that’s the thing that’d solve everything. Just that it helps.

            Term limits makes buying politicians more expensive and insider trading less lucrative, while containing the damage one bad actor can do. Overturning Citizens United makes it even more expensive. Switching from FPTP to ranked choice voting makes third party candidates more viable. Abolishing the Electoral College equalizes the value of votes between rural and urban citizens. Age limits make it so that politicians have to live with the consequences of their actions for longer. Expanding the judiciary makes justice swifter and makes it less likely that a politician who breaks the law can escape justice by being elected again.

            There’s certainly not a magic bullet. We have to do a lot of things. I’d agree that age limits aren’t the highest problems on the list—but they’re on it.

      • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It’s absolutely an age issue. When was the last time you met someone over the age of 60 who was both good with computers and technology in general and also has never worked in the tech industry? Id also love to see the number of government elected officials who have ever suffered any sort of real poverty and compare their ages to their peers. I guarantee that spreadsheet alone tells a novel.

        I want to see an enforced retirement age, a maximum age for first time election, and a strict term limit for all positions of government. I would also love to see all elected and appointed officials stripped of the right to financial privacy and a sort of jury system of a quarterly ethics board made up of citizens chosen at random to make review decisions on official government actions.

        It’s time citizens had more control over our government. They are employed by our tax dollars after all.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Eh, I dunno. I think the complaints about age and term limits should be cast aside. It’s red herring when it comes to the real problems we have. There is nothing inherently magical about age.

          Right now, I’m watching the likes of Big Balls being given the keys to the kingdom, and even though they are 19, I see zero evidence they could give a rat’s ass about how anything works, even if they might have been considered good at one small aspect of tech. Even if they were a child prodigy at one sliver of time’s tech, it doesn’t mean they know shit about government, or even other aspects of tech if for instance that tech involves something like Cobol.

          I also don’t think being good with computers or tech has much to do with being good at governance, and that’s coming from a life-long techie. I mean I would just love and delight in a world in which tech skills magically extrapolated to being good at everything else, but I just don’t think it works like that.

          So even assuming a role like Big Balls and doge were something American voters actually wanted and was legal, I could care less if someone knows tech or not, if their motivations are warped and they have acquired zero wisdom and their platform doesn’t align with actual progress for the American people - they could be demons there just to dismantle government and too young to know the difference.

  • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The challengers we need are to the entire DNC. They are a failure at representative government

  • moakley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Surprising New Primary Challenger

    That’s not that surprising. I was hoping it was like a golden retriever or something.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Saikat Chakrabarti, AOC’s former chief of staff, thinks the Democrats need a bolder vision.

    Fuck yes they do!

    • Toto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      The message that could be sent by a champagne to kick NP out could start a left wing movement.

      • Logi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is going to be a California Bubbly at best though. But they can be tasty too.

  • Absaroka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Good.

    Much like the appeasers that enabled Hitler, history is going to look back on Pelosi, Schumer, Kamala, Biden, Obama, Clinton, Jefferies, and other democrats who stood by and let all this happen on their watch without so much as a wimper.