Anons argue in comments

  • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    That freedom comes at quite a cost. Both to the driver and society. Riding a bike puts the “free” in freedom

    • bluemellophone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Taking a vacation road trip from Florida to the Grand Canyon with three kids with only bikes also comes at quite the cost. Bikes are great, but in many practical scenarios they are slow. Not all of us live in Manhattan, or a dense city, or even a well connected and safe to traverse suburb.

      Bikes cost time.

      • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        If you were to say, ride a bike from Washington D.C. to Portland Oregon, they money saved on gas, maintenance, insurance, and lease payments, would amount to 3 times as many hours of work.

        This is a ridiculous example, but, frankly, saying our main mode of transit should be cars because we might want to take a long road trip once a year is absurd. It’s an outlier use case that could be addressed with other systems more effectively.

      • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Sure there are situations where bikes aren’t suitable.

        Bikes cost time. You have to think of the time it has cost you to earn the money to buy, run, and maintain a car.

      • Hupf@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It is much easier to take a bike with you on a train than it is a car.