fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 months agocheck it before you wreck itmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square43linkfedilinkarrow-up1913arrow-down117
arrow-up1896arrow-down1external-linkcheck it before you wreck itmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square43linkfedilink
minus-squareCornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down3·edit-221 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareCarbonBasedNPU@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-27 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoI agree. Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
minus-squareSeptimaeus@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoI mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties. Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution. You can have both.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I agree.
Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
I mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties.
Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution.
You can have both.