nahostdeutschland@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 个月前‘The tyranny of apps’: those without smartphones are unfairly penalised, say campaignerswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square317linkfedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down117cross-posted to: smartphone_required@lemmy.sdf.orgaskandroid@lemdro.idhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up11.11Karrow-down1external-link‘The tyranny of apps’: those without smartphones are unfairly penalised, say campaignerswww.theguardian.comnahostdeutschland@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 个月前message-square317linkfedilinkcross-posted to: smartphone_required@lemmy.sdf.orgaskandroid@lemdro.idhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squaresem@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 个月前They know that a lot of people would rather have it work a little better by getting an app, if they keep reminding people it’s an option. Even if “better” is just lack of nags. It’s sad. We need a digital privacy law so that an app can’t be more invasive than the website.
minus-squareShowroom7561@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-28 个月前 Even if “better” is just lack of nags. Well, they just swap nags from “download our app” to “rate our app” no matter what you do, you’ll be nagged…
They know that a lot of people would rather have it work a little better by getting an app, if they keep reminding people it’s an option.
Even if “better” is just lack of nags.
It’s sad. We need a digital privacy law so that an app can’t be more invasive than the website.
Well, they just swap nags from “download our app” to “rate our app” no matter what you do, you’ll be nagged…