• adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 days ago

      well, the one that hit the news recently is that bullshit $400m ‘armored tesla’ contract for state department. the one they ‘oopsed’ and went back to remove tesla by name from.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 days ago

        That whole thing sounds rather counterintuitive. Armor is supposed to protect the occupants of the vehicle, but Tesla’s crown jewel of armored* trucks has a track record of spontaneous system failures that put its occupants in direct harm.

        *with glass windows and steel sheet metal that can’t stop a bullet.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Looks like that was initiated under the Biden administration?

        The Tesla contract started in the Biden administration “to explore interest from private companies to produce armored electric vehicles,” a State Department spokesperson said on Thursday.

        Tesla was the only company to express interest in the department’s request at the time.

        https://www.npr.org/2025/02/13/g-s1-48571/trump-administration-order-400-million-worth-of-armored-teslas

        • nexguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Doesn’t matter. Musk must withdrawal his company from consideration due to conflict of interest.

          • Denjin
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            He’s not elected. He couldn’t give a f about conflict of interest.