Even if that’s the case, in what way exactly would this invalidate what the documentary shows? They went to Donbass to get testimonies and images directly from the peoples living here. Are you arguing that all the shelled demolished infrastructure and the artillery fire noises we hear thorough are just a setting and that all the peoples recounting the atrocities they saw and lived through are all paid actors? If so, do you have any evidence whatsoever to prove it? If not, what does Russia’s funding change exactly?
Even if that’s the case, in what way exactly would this invalidate what the documentary shows? They went to Donbass to get testimonies and images directly from the peoples living here. Are you arguing that all the shelled demolished infrastructure and the artillery fire noises we hear thorough are just a setting and that all the peoples recounting the atrocities they saw and lived through are all paid actors? If so, do you have any evidence whatsoever to prove it? If not, what does Russia’s funding change exactly?