The Court held that an individual will “exceed authorized access” under the CFAA when he or she accesses a computer without authorization and obtains information located in particular areas of the computer, such as files or databases, that are off-limits to him. Because Van Buren had access to the license plate information he accessed, the Court reversed the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion. Thus, employers should carefully review employees’ computer access, as access for improper purpose may be permitted under the CFAA.
I’m not going to reply anymore because you’re just doing debate bro shit without actually understanding what is happening and what has happened with the CFAA. The outcome of Van Buren forced the DOJ to issue explicit guidance which backtracked on previous things they would prosecute.
I’m not going to reply anymore because you’re just doing debate bro shit without actually understanding what is happening and what has happened with the CFAA. The outcome of Van Buren forced the DOJ to issue explicit guidance which backtracked on previous things they would prosecute.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/06/van-buren-victory-against-overbroad-interpretations-cfaa-protects-security
And you’re not reading your sources, none of those are about access to .gov sites and yet again critique is scope and vagueries.
Like actually reading or basing my argument on factual law not multiple unresolved opinion. Fuck would you need that for huh?