Yes but those in the coops have their own possessions. Certainly if you try to take away something as basic as the food they intend to eat themselves they are going to have limits.
A co op for managing the profits and work of a business makes great sense. But even hard core communists want their own pants and shoes and would be reluctant to give away thier own needs.
Obviously a deal communes drive towards is provide based on your ability, be provided to based on your needs.
I think the meme pushes on the perception of the individual of their “needs” (real or hypothetical)
Edit the point is the meme is all about personal possessions, to use the keywords of the replies.
Yes but those in the coops have their own possessions. Certainly if you try to take away something as basic as the food they intend to eat themselves they are going to have limits.
A co op for managing the profits and work of a business makes great sense. But even hard core communists want their own pants and shoes and would be reluctant to give away thier own needs.
Obviously a deal communes drive towards is provide based on your ability, be provided to based on your needs.
I think the meme pushes on the perception of the individual of their “needs” (real or hypothetical)
Edit the point is the meme is all about personal possessions, to use the keywords of the replies.
Well yes we recognise the difference between personal and private property.
Weird almost duplicate replies
Eh I don’t think there’s any other way to talk about the concept in this context.
Congrats on recognizing that personal property is different, and isn’t private property.