Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agoSubscribe now for your life saving warnings!mander.xyzimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1216arrow-down11cross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
arrow-up1215arrow-down1imageSubscribe now for your life saving warnings!mander.xyzRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agomessage-square24fedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
minus-squareComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·16 hours agoI say both sides because it is explicitly true. You can’t keep working within the system when the system was never meant to benefit you
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·15 hours agoIt very clearly isn’t true, even for milquetoast democrats: You can’t work at all if you let the system ignore you.
minus-squareComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-215 hours agoNice graphs, I have some too The parties get different funding but neither of them are going to save you from the interests of capital
minus-squareporous_grey_matter@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 hours agoTheir confidence intervals overlap…
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 hours agoIn the short term yes, in the long term no.
I say both sides because it is explicitly true. You can’t keep working within the system when the system was never meant to benefit you
It very clearly isn’t true, even for milquetoast democrats:
You can’t work at all if you let the system ignore you.
Nice graphs, I have some too
The parties get different funding but neither of them are going to save you from the interests of capital
Their confidence intervals overlap…
In the short term yes, in the long term no.