Summary

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, in a private meeting inadvertently broadcast via a hot mic, warned that Donald Trump is seriously considering annexing Canada to secure its critical mineral resources.

Speaking to business and labor leaders, Trudeau claimed Trump’s administration is keenly aware of Canada’s resource wealth and sees annexation as a means to control it.

The comments, cut off after staff realized they were audible, underscore growing economic and political tensions.

He also stressed the need to diversify trade, noting, “Geography means we’re always going to both benefit and be challenged by trade with the United States.”

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’d consider supporting it, if there was a serious public discussion on the matter.

    The one argument against it - besides the lame “that’s violent” or “we couldn’t actually need one” - is that saving this one nation isn’t worth the increased risk of a nuclear exchange.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      saving this one nation isn’t worth the increased risk of a nuclear exchange.

      If a nuclear exchange happens anywhere, I imagine every country on the planet is going to be affected by it, so you might as well protect yourself.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Risk as in risk of it happening, not risk if it does happen.

        Nuclear proliferation is what we’re talking about, and the basic idea is that if you have n nuclear powers, that’s O(n2) potential conflicts that could start at any moment.

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I don’t think you have time for “serious public discussion on the matter”.

      Once all the 2025 assholes are in place it’s go time.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Hmm… I’m actually not sure if the government could do this without passing a bill. If they have to pass a bill, you bet there will be public discussion during the debate period, and probably before as well.

        The the government of the day could just do it, I guess it’s not impossible, although they’d have to be a Doug Ford-level blowhard.

        • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I feel it would kinda be a :

          wink wink nudge nudge

          Holy shit! 3 UK and 2 French nukes just appeared in our arsenal! Would you look at that!! They even have the keys and everything!! Guess we didn’t even know we had them this entire time! What were you saying now, you orange colored sack of shit?