Summary

Jeff Bezos’s Earth Fund has ended its funding for the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), a major climate certification group, raising concerns that billionaires are shifting away from climate action under Trump.

While Earth Fund claims the $18M grant expired as planned, critics argue political pressure influenced the decision.

Trump’s administration has cut climate mentions from federal sites and slashed green funding, prompting corporations to retreat from climate commitments.

Experts fear this signals a broader decline in green investment as Trump aggressively rolls back environmental initiatives.

  • ImInLoveWithLife@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Billionaires ‘bowing down’ to Trump? Like they are reluctant? Like they aren’t helping orchestrate this direction? Like they give a fuck about anything but their bottom line in the short term? Like this isn’t an administration designed in plain view for billionaire interests, more so than any previous administration?

  • ofcourse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    24 hours ago

    The super rich have only one goal - to become richer.

    It always requires labor exploitation.

    Sometimes to improve their public perception, their PR teams suggest philanthropy, which they then use for tax evasion.

    Other times like now, they don’t give a fuck about public perception because the public has chosen racism and bigotry.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I guess all of them standing right behind him at his coronation wasn’t enough of a clue.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    What if instead of “bowing down”, ALL of their DEI/nature/climate/… shit was always performative and meant as cheap PR while they privately couldn’t give two flying fucks?

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    I expect that a lot of this isn’t “bowing down to Trump”, it’s just people going “oh good, I can stop wasting money on initiatives I didn’t really believe in without facing backlash over it.”

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m no economist but I think anything after 1billion should stop being considered “property” of the CEO/owner that is able to be monetized and should have some legal differentiation that defines it as the sole property of the corporation for purposes of defining ownership.

      Everyone argues that you can’t force a billionaire to have to liquidate their wealth (stocks) because it will tank the company, even though they can leverage their stocks to fund their life, so they shouldn’t be allowed to own that kind of wealth to begin with. The difference after 1billion should be considered a type of “ownership token” to keep the ownership of a company in the hands of the person that made the company/runs it until they decide to pass the ownership on to someone else.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Shut up. Your ideas are dumb and will give everyone access to food.

      Wait, that can’t be right… Hold on… - checks notes -

      Oh okay, I get it now. Here we go!

      Shut up. Your easily implemented “simple plans” would make universal healthcare easily accessible.

      Huh… I know there’s a good argument in here… - thumbs through pages of notes -

      Look, quit trying to make unchecked capitalism look bad by simply talking about it!

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is this the same group that advocated for transitioning all schools and prisons to become 100% vegan, recognizing it to be an essential requirement to mitigate the climate catastrophe?