• MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    As a fellow reluctant Harris voter, what upsets me the most is that the numbers people have run shows that no, actually, genocide was not the deciding factor in this election, which is kind of an indictment of America itself, but regardless, I’m sick of leftists being blamed when all the ones I know STILL voted Harris and the data shows that it wasn’t leftist that didn’t turn out, it was centrists. Harris didn’t have a voter base. Sure, some dems turned out, but she didn’t actually inspire people to vote, and that’s basically the only way dems win.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Why blame the politicians with data and statistics on how to run a campaign when you can blame the voters who showed up?

      How many times do we have to “swallow our pride” to vote for milquetoast candidates before we can have change? How many times do I have to vote for “nothing will fundamentally change” before I can call bullshit?

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        This exactly. Honestly, the thing I hate most about the republicans isn’t even who they are, it’s who they’ve made us. I’ve compromised on my morals more than I can count just to still be ruled by fascists. I wish I could at least have arrived here on a high horse lmaoooo.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Republicans are obviously fucking evil. They smile as they pass laws that enable the worst parts of the government to be even worse. And then say it’s because of the woke or some shit.

          And then democrats just… Allow it. They then go “our compromise was that we allowed 2% less people to die from this bill being passed. So only 500K will die from this, instead of 501K.”

          And it’s obviously better by numbers, but that’s all they want. Pure data. They don’t care about the optics of actually trying to stop republicans, they want the look of it.

          They don’t want to stop aiding genocide, pretending they care about BIPOC as they say to bipartisan applause “We need to fund the police!” as they kneel for a photo.

          But pass a law that says “Police should obey the laws they enforce” is impossible for them, somehow, no matter how many votes they get.

          I’ve been swindled too many times. Republicans are obvious in that they hate me. Democrats act like a friend and then ghost you.

          • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Wish I had more to add, but you definitely covered it all. It’s just gross. I know fascists win when we disengage, but dems have been teeing this up for them to knock out of the park for decades. I just wish you and yours the best and I hope you’re safe and able to make it through.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s because she has no message. All she could promise voters was stuff like “I’ll give you a little bit of money to help you get a house.” She was all flash and no substance.

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        For what it’s worth, she did have some good policy proposals, but she had some good policy proposals for a neoliberal. The US has had enough of neo liberal politics, and it’s extremely unfortunate that it meant a turn to fascism. She was going to be a JoeBiden 2.0, if not even less effective. Joe Biden’s seminal piece of legislation with build back better couldn’t even make it through. Easy to point to things that you want to do, even if they are liberal, but neo liberals have been failing to enact even their absolutely minimal policy desires. It’s so pathetic and so sad that we are all suffering because the owning class is the way that it is

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        *for first time homebuyers who have rented for at least 2 years without a late payment

        Because there’s nothing that makes a proposal more popular than adding means-testing.

        She had a message, it was “more of the same”; when asked what she would do differently from Biden her response wasn’t “Fuck this guy who spent the last 4 years doing fuckall, I would have defended abortion rights, appointed an AG who would have put Trump in prison and gone after Manchin and Sinoma, and any republican, a head of the DEA who would have unscheduled cannabis, etc”, she said the difference was that she would appoint a republican to the cabinet.

        • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          100%

          She could have read a laundry list of her First Week, Month intended actions and won over huge swaths of voters- if that was her strategy to win.

          Instead she chose fuckall, which is exactly what Biden did for 4 years.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That promise for housing gets misquoted as well as what she actually offered was:
        First generation homebuyers who no one in their family has ever owned a house, after paying rent in a government approved rental firm for 2 years could get up to $25,000. And stated starter homes would cost between $300,000 and $800,000 dollars depending on location.

        She did have a point to ask Congress to pass legislation to slow people buying more than 50 single family homes.

        This was lost to her wealthy advisors telling her to not go through with these plans as they would impact the investment opportunities of housing.

        She barely even got to flash before the DNC tried to reign in anything that might change things.

        • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yea, I see a lot of quotes online about how her brother-in-law or whatever had her rein in some policies and how she had a bunch of advisors that further reined in her policies, but if anything that kind of proves their point. She had no substance of her own and was willing to campaign on literally nothing believing that was the way to get elected. Kinda a devastating indictment of both her and the dems and the political industrial complex.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Agreed. Absolutely agreed.

            She offered so little in the first place that the fact that she was told to offer even less with expectations that it would make her win the more desperate masses because it wasn’t anything “bad™” at least… It’s a huge statement on what they want to offer and what they expect in return:

            The answer to both is simply, nothing.
            Give nothing and expect nothing in return so that things hopefully stay the same. It’s a massive failing of politics right now.